Interpretation of the Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology in China (2nd edition) (III): comparison of global guidelines

Published on Mar. 29, 2025Total Views: 328 times Total Downloads: 109 times Download Mobile

Author: YAN Jinan ^1, ² WU Yunxiao ^1, ² NIE Xiaolu ³ ZHAO Houyu ⁴  ZHAN Siyan ^1, ^2, ^4, ⁵  SUN Feng ^1, ^2, ^5, ^6, ^7, ⁸

Affiliation: 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China 2. Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China 3. Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Evidence-based Medicine, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing 100045, China 4. Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China 5. Center of Postmarketing Safety Evaluation PUHSC, Beijing 100191, China 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China 7. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830017, China 8. School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

Keywords: Pharmacoepidemiology Methodological guideline Systematic review

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202503119

Reference: YAN Jinan, WU Yunxiao, NIE Xiaolu, ZHAO Houyu, ZHAN Siyan, SUN Feng. Interpretation of the Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology in China (2nd edition) (III): comparison of global guidelines[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2025, 34(3): 241-259. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202503119.[Article in Chinese]  Copied

Abstract
Full-text
References

Abstract

It has been not been updated for nearly 5 years since the Pharmacoepidemiology Professional Committee of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association released the Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology in China (1st edition) in 2019, and an update is urgently needed. This study adopts a systematic review approach to comprehensively search for global pharmacoepidemiology methodological guidelines and analyze their development status. By extracting the frameworks and key elements of the guidelines, the China’s guide was compared with other included guidelines, its shortcomings were analysed, and pragmatic and feasible suggestions for improvement in line with China's national conditions, were proposed in order to provide references for updating China's guide. A systematic search was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data and 17 official websites of international academic organizations for pharmacoepidemiology and regulatory agencies from countries or regions including Europe, the United States, Japan, and China, etc., and relevant guidelines or standards were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the inclusion of 33 methodological guidelines or standards for pharmacoepidemiological studies. A qualitative synthesis approach was then employed to extract core elements from the guidelines through thematic categorization and content summarization, followed by a descriptive comparative analysis. The results indicate that the 1st edition of the China’s guide provides relatively comprehensive guidance on adverse drug reaction reporting and publication of research findings. However, there are gaps in study protocol development, data analysis during study implementation, study reporting, and specific study scenarios. By integrating and drawing upon the latest international pharmacoepidemiology methodology guidelines while balancing comprehensiveness, practicality, and user-friendliness, this study provides recommendations for updating the China’s guide.

Full-text

Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download

References

1.曾繁典, 郑荣远, 詹思延, 等主编. 药物流行病学，第2版[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2016: 1-21.

2.胥洋, 丁呈怡, 詹思延. 中国药物流行病学研究方法学指南[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2019, 28(1): 5-9. [Xu Y, Ding CY, Zhan SY. Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2019, 28(1): 5-9.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2019.01.002.

3.The European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP). Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology (Revision 11)[R/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-15]. https://encepp.europa.eu/encepp-toolkit/methodological-guide_en.

4.颜济南, 吴昀效, 聂晓璐, 等. 《中国药物流行病学研究方法学指南（第2版）》的制订/修订过程[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(2): 121-135. [Yan JN, Wu YX, Nie XL, et al. Revision process of the Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology in China (2nd edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(2): 121-135.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202502028.

5.胥洋, 丁呈怡, 卓琳, 等. 《药物流行病学研究方法学指南》团体标准的制定过程[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2019, 28(10): 631-635. [Xu Y, Ding CY, Zhuo L, et al. Developing Process of Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2019, 28(10): 631-635.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2019.10.001.

6.International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practice (GPP)[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2016, 25(1): 2-10. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3891.

7.The SAMM guidelines: Guidelines for company-sponsored safety assessment of marketed medicines[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 1994, 3(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.1002/pds.2630030103.

8.Food and Drug Administration. Good Pharmacovigilance Practices and Pharmacoepidemiologic Assessment[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.fda.gov/media/71546/download.

9.Good ReseArch for Comparative Effectiveness. GRACE Principles: Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness[R/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.graceprinciples.com/doc/GRACE_Principles.pdf.

10.Jalbert JJ, Ritchey ME, Mi X, et al. Methodological considerations in observational comparative effectiveness research for implantable medical devices: an epidemiologic perspective[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2014, 180(9): 949-958. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu206.

11.Morton JB, McConeghy R, Heinrich K, et al. Consensus of recommendations guiding comparative effectiveness research methods[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2016, 25(12): 1354-1360. DOI: 10.1002/pds.4051.

12.Berger ML, Sox H, Willke RJ, et al. Good practices for real-world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2017, 26(9): 1033-1039. DOI: 10.1002/pds.4297.

13.European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module VIII-Post-authorisation safety studies (rev 3)[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-good-pharmacovigilance-practices-gvp-module-viii-post-authorisation-safety-studies-rev-3_en.pdf.

14.The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. CIOMS Guide to Active Vaccine Safety Surveillance: report of CIOMS Working Group on Vaccine Safety[R/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://cioms.ch/publications/product/cioms-guide-to-active-vaccine-safety-surveillance/.

15.Kurz X, Bauchau V, Mahy P, et al. The ADVANCE Code of Conduct for collaborative vaccine studies[J]. Vaccine, 2017, 35(15): 1844-1855. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.039.

16.Desai RJ, Kim SC, Curtis JR, et al. Methodologic considerations for noninterventional studies of switching from reference biologic to biosimilars[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2020, 29(7): 757-769. DOI: 10.1002/pds.4809.

17.Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Exceptions and modifications to the EU guidance on good pharmacovigilance practices that apply to UK marketing authorisation holders and the licensing authority[R/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fee14e6e90e0776a8d56123/Exceptions_and_modifications_to_the_EU_guidance_on_good_pharmacovigilance_practices_that_apply_to_UK_MAHs_v2.pdf.

18.王巍巍, 卓琳, 詹思延, 等. 药械安全性评价研究的系统综述和Meta分析制作指南[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2020, 29(7): 502-509. [Wang WW, Zhuo L, Zhan SY, et al. Guide on conducting systematic reviews and Meta-analyses of safety evaluation in pharmacoepidemiology research[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2020, 29(7): 502-509.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2020.07.011.

19.国家药品监督管理局. 真实世界数据用于医疗器械临床评价技术指导原则（试行）[S]. 2024.

20.Pottegård A, Kurz X, Moore N, et al. Considerations for pharmacoepidemiological analyses in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2020, 29(8): 825-831. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5029.

21.国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心. 用于产生真实世界证据的真实世界数据指导原则（试行）[R/OL]. (2024-05-01) [2024-12-17]. https://www.cde.org.cn/zdyz/domesticinfopage?zdyzIdCODE=7d2e46cea0e459358257760383526e9d.

22.European Medicines Agency. Guideline on registry-based studies[S/OL]. (2021-10-22) [2024-05-04]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-registry-based-studies_en.pdf-0.

23.Aurich B, Apele-Freimane D, Banaschewski T, et al. c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children - A c4c expert group white paper[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 88(12): 4997-5016. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15119.

24.Sarri G, Patorno E, Yuan H, et al. Framework for the synthesis of non-randomised studies and randomised controlled trials: a guidance on conducting a systematic review and Meta-analysis for healthcare decision making[J]. BMJ Evid Based Med, 2022, 27(2): 109-119. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111493.

25.王志飞, 谢雁鸣, 唐健元, 等. 中成药上市后临床有效性研究指南[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2024, 49(3): 842-848. [Wang ZF, Xie YM, Tang JY, et al. Guidelines for post-marketing research on clinical effectiveness of Chinese patent medicines[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2024, 49(3): 842-848.] DOI: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20231013.501.

26.Hayes KN, Cadarette SM, Burden AM. Methodological guidance for the use of real-world data to measure exposure and utilization patterns of osteoporosis medications[J]. Bone Rep, 2024, 20: 101730. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101730.

27.Verstraeten T, DeStefano F, Chen RT, et al. Vaccine safety surveillance using large linked databases: Opportunities, hazards and proposed guidelines[J]. Expert Rev Vaccines, 2003, 2(1): 21-29. DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2.1.21.

28.Hall GC, Sauer B, Bourke A, et al. Guidelines for good database selection and use in pharmacoepidemiology research[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2012, 21(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1002/pds.2229.

29.Food and Drug Administration. Best Practices for Conducting and Reporting Pharmacoepidemiologic Safety Studies Using Electronic Healthcare Data Sets[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.fda.gov/media/79922/download.

30.Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Guidelines for the Conduct of Pharmacoepidemiological Studies in Drug Safety Assessment with Medical Information Databases (version 1)[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000240951.pdf.

31.Pratt NL, Mack CD, Meyer AM, et al. Data linkage in pharmacoepidemiology: a call for rigorous evaluation and reporting [J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2020, 29(1): 9-17. DOI: 10.1002/pds.4924.

32.Rivera DR, Gokhale MN, Reynolds MW, et al. Linking electronic health data in pharmacoepidemiology: appropriateness and feasibility[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2020, 29(1): 18-29. DOI: 10.1002/pds.4918.

33.European Medicines Agency. Guidance for the format and content of the protocol of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/system/files/documents/other/wc500133174_en.pdf.

34.Wang SV, Pottegård A, Crown W, et al. HARmonized protocol template to enhance reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real-world evidence studies on treatment effects: a good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2023, 32(1): 44-55. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5507.

35.European Medicines Agency. Guidance for the format and content of the final study report of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies[S/OL]. (2024-05-04) [2024-12-17]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/system/files/documents/regulatory-procedural-guideline/wc500137939_en.pdf.

36.Langan SM, Schmidt SA, Wing K, et al. The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE)[J]. BMJ, 2018, 363: k3532. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3532.

37.卓琳, 贾敏, 沈智文, 等. 药物流行病学研究中的一次数据源介绍[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2021, 30(3): 151-154. [Zhuo L, Jia M, Shen ZW, et al. Primary data sources in pharmacoepidemiology studies[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2021, 30(3): 151-154.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2021.03.001.

38.卓琳, 马慧宁, 贾敏, 等. 药物流行病学研究中的二次数据源[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2021, 30(4): 219-223. [Zhuo L, Ma HN, Jia M, et al. Secondary data sources in pharmacoepidemiology studies[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2021, 30(4): 219-223.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2021.04.001.

39.国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 人类生物样本保藏伦理要求[S/OL]. (2024-09-30) [2024-12-17]. http://c.gb688.cn/bzgk/gb/showGb?type=online&hcno=EAEB2F0A1040E54B097239EDF59E4057.

40.中华人民共和国药品管理法[S]. 2024.

41.国家药品监督管理局. 药物警戒质量管理规范[S]. 2024.

42.丁蕾, 潘梅竹, 牟为, 等. 人工智能在个体健康管理和群体疾病监测中的应用进展[J]. 同济大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 43(2): 272-277. [Ding L, Pan MZ, Mou W, et al. Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in individual health management and population disease surveillance[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Medical edition), 2022, 43(2): 272-277.] DOI: 10.12289/j.issn.1008-0392.21322.

43.喻涵雨, 陈鑫. 基于CiteSpace软件分析我国可穿戴设备在健康领域的研究热点[J]. 医疗装备, 2024, 37(21): 24-28. [Yu HY, Chen X. The analysis of research hotspots of wearable devices in the field of health in China based on CiteSpace software[J]. Medical Equipment Journal, 2024, 37(21): 24-28.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2024.21.006.

44.卢存存, 陈子佳, 张强, 等. 基于真实世界数据的目标试验模拟研究: 现状与展望[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(4): 492-496. [Lu CC, Chen ZJ, Zhang Q, et al. Target trial emulation study based on real world data:status quo and prospect[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(4), 492-496.] https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZZXZ202304011.htm.

45.国家药品监督管理局. 真实世界证据支持药物研发与审评的指导原则（试行）[S]. 2024.

46.国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心. 药物真实世界研究设计与方案框架指导原则（试行）[R/OL]. (2024-10-20) [2024-12-21]. https://www.cde.org.cn/zdyz/domesticinfopage?zdyzIdCODE=684f09aecdd4fb1e3c39134b2c915c4b.