Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 33,2024 No.10 Detail

Cost-utility analysis of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

Published on Nov. 07, 2024Total Views: 226 times Total Downloads: 38 times Download Mobile

Author: HU Yunjia ZOU Keqing HOU Yanhong

Affiliation: School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China

Keywords: Pembrolizumab Chemotherapy Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma Partitioned survival model Cost-utility analysis Pharmacoeconomic evaluation

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202407011

Reference: HU Yunjia, ZOU Keqing, HOU Yanhong.Cost-utility analysis of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2024, 33(10):1107-1114.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202407011.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To explore and evaluate the economy of pembrolizumab combined chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma from the perspective of China's healthcare system, and to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence and reference for clinical medication and related health decisions.

Methods  A partition survival model was constructed based on the IND227 study data, with 21 d as the model period and simulated to 99% of patients died. The model output index was the quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the economics of combination chemotherapy for advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma by chemotherapy alone. Further, the robustness of the basic analysis results was proved by univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results  The results of basic analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy alone, the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy was 1  447 296.58  yuan/ QALY, which was greater than 3 times China's per capita GDP (268 074  yuan/ QALY) in 2023 as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, which was not economical. In the case of receiving charity drug donations, the ICUR was 102 236.18 yuan/QALY, which was below the WTP threshold. The results of univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of pembrolizumab, utility discount rate and supportive therapy in the chemotherapy group had more significant effects on the results. The results of the probability sensitivity analysis showed that the basic analysis results showed good robustness.

Conclusion At a WTP threshold of 3 times China's per capita GDP in 2023, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy is not cost-effective for treating advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. However, if the patient receives charity donations, combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy is more cost-utility.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.傅芬, 张扬, 沈红. 恶性胸膜间皮瘤靶向治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2024, 27(5): 391-398.[Fu F, Zhang Y, Shen H. Advances in targeted therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer, 2024, 27(5): 391-398.] DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.18.

2.陈阳育, 张予辉, 施焕中. 恶性胸膜间皮瘤的管理[J].中华内科杂志, 2021, 60(11): 1002-1004. [Chen YY, Zhang YH, Shi HZ. Recommendations for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2021, 60(11): 1002-1004.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20210814-00555.

3.Mastromarino MG, Aprile V, Lucchi M. Editorial: Advances in malignant pleural mesothelioma: diagnosis, treatment, and molecular mechanisms[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1158416. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158416.

4.Opitz I, Scherpereel A, Berghmans T, et al. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2020, 58(1): 1-24. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158.

5.杨侃, 胡文滕, 韩彪. CAR-T在治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤中的研究进展[J]. 新医学, 2021, 52(12): 903-906. [Yang K, Hu WT, Han B. Research progress on application of CAR-T in treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma[J]. New Medicine, 2021, 52(12): 903-906.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2021.12.003.

6.朱永基. 双免疫疗法为恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者带来生存获益[N]. 健康报, 2021-12-10. 第6版.

7.中国医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会. 中国恶性胸膜间皮瘤临床诊疗指南(2021版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2021, 43(4): 383-394. [Multidisciplinary Committee of Oncology, Chinese Physicians Association. Chinese guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (2021 Edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2021, 43(4): 383-394.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210313-00225.

8.毛伟敏, 陆舜, 王俊, 等. 恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)诊治共识(2022, 杭州)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2022, 31(12): 941-951. [Mao WM, Lu S, Wang J. Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (2022, Hangzhou)[J]. China Cancer, 2022, 31(12): 941-951.] DOI: 10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2022.12.A002.

9.张亮, 周秋云, 侯文洁, 等. 帕博利珠单抗一线治疗非小细胞肺癌的药物经济学分析[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2022, 39(24): 3284-3289. [Zhang L, Zhou QY, Hou WJ, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy, 2022, 39(24): 3284-3289.] DOI: 10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2022.24.015.

10.Chu Q, Perrone F, Greillier L, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma in Canada, Italy, and France: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 402(10419): 2295-2306. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01613-6.

11.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

12.刘国恩, 主编. 中国药物经济学评价指南2020[M]. 北京: 中国市场出版社, 2020: 27-46.

13.国家统计局. 国家数据[EB/OL]. (2024-02-29) [2024-06-01]. http://data.stats.gov.cn/.

14.苏展, 车金辉, 裴锐锋. 替雷利珠单抗较索拉非尼作为晚期不可切除肝细胞癌一线治疗的成本-效用分析[J]. 中国药师, 2024, 27(1): 109-116. [Su Z, Che JH, Pei RF. Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. China Pharmacist, 2024, 27(1): 109-116.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202312216.

15.Wu Y, Dong Z, Wang J, et al. Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(11): e065299. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065299.

16.黄先涛, 靖超, 赵丽娟, 等. 2015年—2017年某三级综合医院恶性肿瘤住院患者费用的影响因素[J]. 中国病案, 2021, 22(9): 66-69. [Huang XT, Jing C, Zhao LJ, et al. Influencing factors of hospitalization expenses of malignant tumor in a grade three general hospital from 2015 to 2017[J]. Chinese Medical Record, 2021, 22(9): 66-69.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2021.09.025.

17.Yang F, Fu Y, Kumar A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of camrelizumab in the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinomain China[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(15): 1226. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1803.

18.Wu B, Dong B, Xu Y, et al. Economic evaluation of first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a health resource-limited setting[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e32530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032530.

19.高红婷, 胡梦雪, 贾琳琳, 等. 信迪利单抗联合化疗一线治疗晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌的成本-效用分析[J]. 中国药房, 2022, 33(15): 1854-1859. [Gao HT, Hu MX, Jia LL, et al. Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer[J]. China Pharmacy, 2022, 33(15): 1854-1859.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.15.12.

20.中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年) [J]. 营养学报, 2020, 42(6): 521. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9577. 2020.12.001.

Popular papers
Last 6 months