Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 32,2023 No.1 Detail

Data mining and analysis for safety signals of degarelix based on openFDA

Published on Jan. 15, 2023Total Views: 1271 times Total Downloads: 499 times Download Mobile

Author: Fu-Rong ZHOU Bei ZHANG Hui-Xiang LI Qing-Na WU Chen-Yu GUO

Affiliation: Department of Pharmacy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264001, Shandong Province, China

Keywords: Degarelix OpenFDA Adverse drug event Signal detection Data mining

DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202301008

Reference: Fu-Rong ZHOU, Bei ZHANG, Hui-Xiang LI, Qing-Na WU, Chen-Yu GUO.Data mining and analysis for safety signals of degarelix based on openFDA[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2023, 32(1): 52-59.DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202301008.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To provide reference for clinical drug safety, the postmarketing safety signals of degarelix for prostate cancer were explored and evaluated.

Methods  Adverse drug events (ADE) reports of degarelix from January 1, 2004 to November 4, 2021 were extracted from the database of the US Food and Drug Administration Public Data Open Project (openFDA). ADE signals were detected and analyzed by using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC). The systems involved in ADEs were classified and evaluated through Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).

Results  During the limited  search period, 4 663 ADE reports with degarelix as the suspected drug were extracted, and serious adverse events accouted for 51.30%. 35 ADE risk signals related to degarelix were mined, involving 9 organs or systems. Based on system organ classification (SOC), the number of positive signals exerted by general disorders and administration site ADE was largest and accounted for 57.14%. Disproportionality analyses showed ADEs induced by general disorders and administration site, investigations, and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders exhibited high signal strength.

Conclusion  When took degarelix, more attention should be paid to the serious ADEs, especially the ADEs for the administration site. Meanwhile, the attention should also be paid to the increase of PSA and ALT, musculoskeletal pain and cardiovascular events.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.赫捷, 陈万青, 李霓, 等. 中国前列腺癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022, 北京)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2022, 44(1): 29-53. [He J, Chen WQ, Li N, et al. China guideline for the screening and early detection of prostate cancer (2022, Beijing)[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2022, 44(1): 29-53.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20211226-00975.

2.姚远兵, 王玲, 夏悦, 等. 治疗前列腺癌的新型GnRH拮抗剂地加瑞克[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2010, 19(3): 179-183. [Yao YB, Wang L, Xia Y, et al. Degarelix: a new generation GnRH-antagonist for treating prostate cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2010, 19(3): 179-183.] https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C44YLTlOAiTRKgchrJ08w1e7_IFawAif0mwmclFjMRc9fJ3z1xPpf6MQsiop9V6bJGUlkA0nE5ca59mcFiufnFqU&uniplatform=NZKPT.

3.李华福, 谢群, 叶啸, 等. 地加瑞克和GnRH激动剂用于治疗进展型前列腺癌疗效及安全性的对比: Meta分析[J]. 现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志, 2017, 9(3): 160-166. [Li HF, Xie Q, Ye X, et al. Curative effect and drug safety of degarelix versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for advanced prostate cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Contemporary Urologic and Reproductive Oncology, 2017, 9(3): 160-166.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1674-4624. 2017.03.008.

4.Degarelix. In: LiverTox: Clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury[R]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2017.

5.方程. GnRH拮抗剂地加瑞克治疗前列腺癌的安全性及有效性的Meta分析[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2017. [Fang C. The efficacy and safety of GnRH antagonist degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017.]

6.Carter NJ, Keam SJ. Degarelix: a review of its use in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Drugs, 2014, 74(6): 699-712. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-014-0211-y.

7.中国临床肿瘤学会工作委员会, 主编.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)前列腺癌诊疗指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2022: 21-22.

8.包旭.美国OpenFDA公众健康项目介绍[J]. 中国执业药师, 2015, 12(10): 18-22. [Bao X. An introduction of American OpenFDA of public health project[J]. China Licensed Pharmacist, 2015, 12(10): 18-22.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5433.2015.10.005.

9.Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA)[J]. Drug Saf, 1999, 20(2): 109-117. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199920020-00002.

10.张秋珍,郑淑芬,钟诗龙,等.基于FAERS数据库挖掘质子泵抑制剂相关不良事件分析[J].广东药科大学学报, 2021, 37(4): 52-59. [Zhang QZ, Zheng SF, Zhong SL, et al. Analysis of proton pump inhibitor related adverse events based on FAERS database[J]. Journal of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, 2021, 37(4): 52-59.] DOI: 10.16809/j.cnki.2096-3653.2021042502.

11.Montastruc J, Sommet A, Bagheri H, et al. Benefits and strengths of the disproportionality analysis for identification of adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2011, 72(6): 905-908. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04037.x.

12.李婵娟. 药品不良反应信号检测方法理论及应用研究[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2008. [Li CJ. Researches on Theory and Application of Adverse Drug Reaction Signal Detection[D]. Xi'an: Fourth Military Medical University, 2008.]

13.Klotz L, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND, et al. The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase Ⅲ study in patients with prostate cancer[J]. BJU Int, 2008, 102(11): 1531-1538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08183.x.

14.Maeda T, Kosaka T, Honda A, et al. Evaluation of histopathological findings at the injection site following degarelix administration[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2015, 23(5): 1377-1381. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2483-x.

15.Van Poppel H, Tombal B, de la Rosette JJ, et al. Degarelix: a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor blocker--results from a 1-yr, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 dosage-finding study in the treatment of prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 54(4): 805-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.065.

16.Gittelman M, Pommerville PJ, Persson BE, et al. A 1-year, open label, randomized phase Ⅱ dose finding study of degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer in North America[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(5): 1986-1992. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.033.

17.Crawford ED, Shore ND, Moul JW, et al. Long-term tolerability and efficacy of degarelix: 5-year results from a phase Ⅲ extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix[J]. Urology, 2014, 83(5): 1122-1128. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.013.

18.Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R, et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: The DILIN prospective study[J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 148(7): 1340-1352.e7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006.

19.Sciarra A, Busetto GM, Salciccia S, et al. Does exist a differential impact of degarelix versus LHRH agonists on cardiovascular safety? Evidences from randomized and real-world studies[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne),2021, 12: 695170. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.695170.

20.Zhang X, Pawlikowski M, Olivo-Marston S, et al. Ten-year cardiovascular risk among cancer survivors: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(3): e247919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247919.

21.Kelly DM, Jones TH. Testosterone: a metabolic hormone in health and disease[J]. J Endocrinol, 2013, 217(3): R25-R45. DOI: 10.1530/JOE-12-0455.

22.Corona G, Rastrelli G, Di Pasquale G, et al. Endogenous testosterone levels and cardiovascular risk: Meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Sex Med, 2018, 15(9): 1260-1271. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.012.

23.Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E. Blood pressure and endogenous testosterone in men: an inverse relationship[J]. J Hypertens, 1988, 6(4): 329-332. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3379300/.

24.Crawford ED, Tombal B, Miller K, et al. A phase Ⅲ extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2011, 186(3): 889-897. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.083.

25.陈坦,赵硕,温儒民,等.前列腺特异性抗原水平变化对接受联合疗法的去势敏感性前列腺癌患者预后的影响[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2021, 26(5): 400-404. [Chen T, Zhao S, Wen RM, et al. Effects of prostate-specific antigen changes on the prognosis of castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients receiving combination therapy[J]. Journal of Modern Urology, 2021, 26(5): 400-404.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2021.05.008.

26.Masson-Lecomte A, Guy L, Pedron P, et al. A switch from GnRH agonist to GnRH antagonist in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients leads to a low response rate on PSA[J]. World J Urol, 2013, 31(2): 339-343. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0841-1.

27.Ammannagari N, Javvaji C, Danchaivijitr P, et al. Dramatic PSA increase with tumor shrinkage after initiating degarelix in advanced prostate cancer[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2016, 14(1): e123-e125. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.09.012.

28.Gupta A, Moore JA. Tumor lysis syndrome[J]. JAMA Oncol,2018,4(6): 895. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018. 0613.

29.Bhardwaj S, Varma S. Rare incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with docetaxel[J]. J Oncol Pharm Pract, 2018, 24(2): 153-155. DOI: 10.1177/1078155217694492.

30.Oshima M, Mayumi S, Yazaki K, et al. Tumor lysis syndrome following cabazitaxel administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a case report[J]. IJU Case Rep, 2019,2(4): 179-182. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12070.

31.Yamamoto Y. Editorial comment to tumor lysis syndrome following cabazitaxel administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a case report[J]. IJU Case Rep, 2019, 2(4): 183. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12080.

32.Gongora A, Canedo F, de Melo A, et al. Tumor lysis syndrome after platinum-based chemotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA2 mutation: A case report[J]. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 2019, 17(1): e61-e64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.001.

33.Pina CJ, Coelho J, Fortuna J, et al. Spontaneous tumor lysis syndrome in prostate cancer[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(9): e18078. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18078.

Popular papers
Last 6 months