Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 35,2026 No.7 Detail

Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of pertuzumab biosimilars versus original drug in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Published on Jul. 31, 2026Total Views: 59 times Total Downloads: 12 times Download Mobile

Author: GU Shilong 1, 2 ZHANG Wenjing 1, 3 GUO Hao 1, 3

Affiliation: 1.Department of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China 2.School of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010017, China 3.Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Essential Drug Monitoring and Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation Center, Hohhot 010017, China

Keywords: Pertuzumab Biosimilars Original drug HER2 Breast cancer Efficacy Safety Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202601004

Reference: Gu SL, Zhang WJ, Guo H. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of pertuzumab biosimilars versus original drug in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2026, 35(7): 810-817. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202601004.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab biosimilars versus the original drug in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Methods Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and Clinical Trials were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials comparing pertuzumab biosimilars with the original drugs. The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to November 2025. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results A Meta-analysis incorporating 4 Phase Ⅲ clinical trials involving 1,241 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer was conducted. The results of the Meta-analysis demonstrated that, across the 4 Phase Ⅲ trials, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in terms of total pathologic complete response rate [RR=0.94, 95% CI (0.84, 1.05), P > 0.05], objective response rate [RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.95,1.05), P > 0.05], incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events [RR=1.09, 95% CI (0.94, 1.26), P > 0.05], and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.95, 1.05), P > 0.05]. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence rates of other adverse events between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion Pertuzumab biosimilars exhibit clinical similarity to the original drug in terms of efficacy and safety, and can serve as an alternative to the original drug in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. 谢雨璇, 王慧如, 赖泳, 等. 基于FAERS数据库的乳腺癌抗体偶联药物风险信号挖掘与分析[J]. 药学前沿, 2026, 30(2): 263-271.XieYX, WangHR, LaiY, et al. Signal detection and analysis of antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer based on the FAERS database[J]. Frontiers in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2026, 30(2): 263-271. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202512045.

2. 孟彦红. 帕妥珠单抗联合曲妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2阳性乳腺癌的临床效果[J]. 临床合理用药, 2025, 18(10): 92-95.MengYH. Clinical efficacy of pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, 2025, 18(10): 92-95. DOI: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2025.10.025.

3. DurkeeBY, QianY, PollomEL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(9): 902-909. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.9105.

4. 纪汶君, 商杨婕, 门鹏, 等. 帕妥珠单抗治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 世界临床药物, 2024, 45(3): 309-316.JiWJ, ShangYJ, MenP, et al. Rapid health technology assessment of pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer[J]. World Clinical Drug, 2024, 45(3): 309-316. DOI: 10.13683/j.wph.2024.03.012.

5. 中国药品综合评价指南项目组. 中国药品综合评价指南参考大纲(第二版)[J]. 药品评价, 2015, 12(8): 6.Project Group of guideline for comprehensive evaluation of medicine in China. Guideline for comprehensive evaluation of medicine in China (2nd ed)[J]. Drug Evaluation, 2015, 12(8): 6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2809.2015.08.001.

6. 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 生物类似药研发与评价技术指导原则(试行)[EB/OL]. (2015-03-11) [2025-12-02]. https://www.renrendoc.com/paper/167239758.html

7. HigginsJP, AltmanDG, GøtzschePC, et al. The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2011, 343: d5928. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.

8. 郑雅婷, 刘松岭, 周立岩. CDK4/6抑制剂剂量优化策略在HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌中疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(7): 795-805.ZhengYT, LiuSL, ZhouLY. Efficacy and safety of dose-optimization strategies for CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(7): 795-805. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202504058.

9. KothariR, DoshiM, ChaithanyaPK, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase III study in India for comparing efficacy, safety, and PK of ZRC-3277 (pertuzumab biosimilar) with Perjeta® in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2024, 24(7): 639-646.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.07.001.

10. ZuoW, WangZ, QianJ, et al. QL1209 (pertuzumab biosimilar) versus reference pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early or locally advanced breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-controlled, phase III equivalence trial[J]. Br J Cancer, 2024, 131(4): 668-675. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02751-2.

11. ZhangQ, WangS, LiN, et al. Comparing the efficacy and safety of TQB2440 versus the reference pertuzumab for the treatment of HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled phase 3 trial[J]. Cancer Res, 2024, 84(9_Supplement): PO1-27-01. DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS23-PO1-27-01.

12. AllahyariA, EhsanpourA, NajafiB, et al. Comparing efficacy and safety of P013, a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar, with the reference product in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: a randomized, phase III, equivalency clinical trial[J]. BMC Cancer, 2022, 22(1): 960. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09895-5.

13. CazzanigaME, CostaL, FreyerG, et al. Risk factors for disease recurrence in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer and implications for therapy: a narrative review[J]. Oncol Ther, 2026, 14(1): 95-112. DOI: 10.1007/s40487-025-00398-4.

14. GradisharWJ, MoranMS, AbrahamJ, et al. Breast cancer, version 3.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(5): 331-357. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.0035.

15. 孙雪林, 钱东方, 金鹏飞, 等. 生物类似药安全性评价现状[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2025, 23(1): 49-54.SunXL, QianDF, JinPF, et al. Current status of safety evaluation of biosimilars[J]. Clinical Medication Journal, 2025, 23(1): 49-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2025.01.009.

16. WuQ, LianZ, WangX, et al. Factors associated with the uptake of biosimilars for breast cancer treatment from the perspectives of physicians and patients-evidence from China[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 13: 1044798. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1044798.

17. NaHJ, KwonSH, SonKH, et al. Comparative safety profiles of oncology biosimilars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. BioDrugs, 2023, 37(2): 205-218. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00576-8.

18. LiuT, LiuD, JinY, et al. Trastuzumab biosimilars vs trastuzumab originator in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis[J]. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol, 2022, 44(6): 809-815. DOI: 10.1080/08923973.2022.2090956.

19. 邓为上, 李梦婷, 胡佳, 等. 曲妥珠单抗生物类似药对比原研药治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国药房, 2022, 33(20): 2529-2533.DengWS, LiMT, HuJ, et al. A Meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab biosimilars versus original drugs in the treatment of HER-2 positive breast cancer[J]. China Pharmacy, 2022, 33(20): 2529-2533. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.20.19.

20. ShinG, HanH, ChoiG, et al. Demand-versus supply-side policies in market penetration of biosimilars: which is more effective?[J]. BioDrugs, 2025, 39(4): 635-644. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00721-5.

21. TeschME, GelmonKA. Targeting HER2 in breast cancer: latest developments on treatment sequencing and the introduction of biosimilars[J]. Drugs, 2020, 80(17): 1811-1830. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01411-y.

22. WynneC, SchwabeC, BatraSS, et al. A comparative pharmacokinetic study of DRL_BZ, a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, with Avastin® (EU and US) in healthy male subjects[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2018, 84(10): 2352-2364. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13691.

23. HembrechtS, ChiodoS, HegartyA, et al. An audit of prescribing practices of pertuzumab (Perjeta) in HER2+ breast cancer patients[J]. Mesentery Peritoneum, 2024, 8: AB034. DOI: 10.21037/map-24-ab034.

24. 孙莹. 医院多西他赛不良反应发生情况[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2020, 15(3): 90-93, 96.SunY. Adverse reactions of docetaxel in hospitals[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 2020, 15(3): 90-93, 96. DOI: 10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2020.03.023.

25. YangL, ZhengZ, LiN, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab biosimilars or reference product as first‐line treatment in patients with low‐tumour‐burden follicular lymphoma: a systematic review and Meta‐analysis[J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2022, 47(12): 1923-1931. DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13799.

Popular papers
Last 6 months