Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 35,2026 No.2 Detail

Mepolizumab for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a rapid health technology assessment

Published on Feb. 27, 2026Total Views: 28 times Total Downloads: 7 times Download Mobile

Author: GU Shilong 1, 2 ZHANG Wenjing 1, 3 GUO Hao 1, 3

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China 2. School of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010017, China 3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Essential Drug Monitoring and Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation Center, Hohhot 010017, China

Keywords: Mepolizumab Refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Effectiveness safety Cost-effectiveness

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202507127

Reference: GU Shilong, ZHANG Wenjing, GUO Hao. Mepolizumab for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a rapid health technology assessment[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2026, 35(2): 192-199. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202507127.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab in the treatment of refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and to provide evidence for clinical application.

Methods  A rapid health technology assessment (HTA) was conducted to systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and SinoMed, as well as official websites of overseas HTA institutions. The search covered HTA reports, systematic reviews/Meta-analyses and pharmacoeconomic studies focusing on mepolizumab for the treatment of CRSwNP, with the retrieval time from the inception to July 1, 2025. After data extraction and quality evaluation, a descriptive analysis was performed on the outcomes of the included studies.

Results  A total of 11 studies were included, comprising 1 HTA report, 8 systematic reviews/Meta-analyses, and 2 pharmacoeconomic studies; in terms of efficacy, mepolizumab significantly improved nasal polyp scores, imaging scores, olfactory function and quality of life versus placebo, while versus other biologics, it achieved the optimal nasal polyp score improvement, showed inferior olfactory function improvement to dupilumab and had inconsistent quality of life evaluation results; regarding safety, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidences of adverse and serious adverse reactions of mepolizumab compared with placebo or other biologics; economically, mepolizumab had no economic advantages over other biologics.

Conclusion  Mepolizumab demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety profiles, providing a valuable treatment alternative for patients with CRSwNP. However, its cost-effectiveness still needs further research based on China's medical environment.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. 杨珂, 李玉杰, 于敏, 等. 鼻内镜手术治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉术后复发的相关影响因素分析[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(25): 28-30. [Yang K, Li YJ, Yu M, et al. Analysis of related influencing factors for postoperative recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated by endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Clinical Medicine Research and Practice, 2021, 6(25): 28-30.] DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202125008.

2. 孙玲莉. 鼻内镜辅助下手术切除术联合鼻腔冲洗治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的疗效及对复发率的影响[J]. 中国处方药, 2020, 18(12): 169-171. [Sun LL. Efficacy of endoscopic-assisted surgical resection combined with nasal irrigation in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and its impact on recurrence rate[J]. China Prescription Drug, 2020, 18(12): 169-171.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-945X.2020.12.086.

3. Hong H, Chen T, Yang Q, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the use of biologics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (2022, Zhuhai)[J]. ORL, 2023, 85(3): 128-140. DOI: 10.1159/000529918.

4. 张罗. 生物制剂治疗慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉的现状和展望[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(11): 853-855. [Zhang L. Current status and prospects of biologics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, 2023, 37(11): 853-855.] DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.11.001.

5. 韦建曦. 抗IgE治疗重度过敏性哮喘的疗效及不良反应分析[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27038/d.cnki.ggxyu.2022.001438.

6. Lelegren MJ, Son SY, Han JK, et al. A review of phase III clinical trials of US FDA-approved biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis[J]. Immunotherapy, 2022, 14(8): 655-662. DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0310.

7. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组. 慢性鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2024)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2025, 60(3): 221-249. [Nasal Group of the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Nasal Group of the Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (2024)[J]. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2025, 60(3): 221-249.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20250116-00051.

8. Hailey D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2003, 19(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1017/s0266462303000011.

9. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both[J]. BMJ, 2017, 358: j4008. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.

10. Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2022, 22(1): 114. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07460-7.

11. 张云轩, 周海峰, 高宁舟, 等. 替尔泊肽治疗2型糖尿病的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(9): 1057-1065. [Zhang YX, Zhou HF, Gao NZ, et al. Tirzepatide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a rapid health technology assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(9): 1057-1065.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202504004.

12. Aldajani A, Alroqi A, Alromaih S, et al. Adverse events of biological therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2022, 43(6): 103615. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103615.

13. Rivero A, Liang J. Anti-IgE and anti-IL5 biologic therapy in the treatment of nasal polyposis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2017, 126(11): 739-747. DOI: 10.1177/0003489417731782.

14. Hopkins C, Han JK, Fokkens W, et al. Dupilumab versus mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: an indirect treatment comparison[J]. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol Pract, 2024, 12(12): 3393-3401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.015.

15. Wang H, Xu X, Lu Z, et al. Efficacy of different biologics for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a network Meta-analysis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2025, 282(2): 559-569. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08903-7.

16. Iqbal IZ, Kao SST, Ooi EH. The role of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review[J] Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2020, 10(2): 165-174. DOI: 10.1002/alr.22473.

17. Oykhman P, Paramo FA, Bousquet J, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies and aspirin desensitization for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review and network Meta-analysis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2022, 149(4): 1286-1295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.009.

18. Wu Q, Zhang Y, Kong W, et al. Which is the best biologic for nasal polyps: dupilumab, omalizumab, or mepolizumab? a network Meta-analysis[J]. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2022, 183(3): 279-288. DOI: 10.1159/000519228.

19. Wang Q, Sun Q, Chen Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2022, 183(7): 732-743. DOI: 10.1159/000521859.

20. Dreyfus L, Tavi J, Msihid J, et al. EE348 number needed to treat and cost-per-responder analysis of dupilumab and mepolizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Value Health, 2024, 27(12): S123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.10.630.

21. Yong M, Kirubalingam K, Desrosiers MY, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of biologics for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Canada[J]. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 2023, 19(1): 90. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-023-00823-1.

22. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Common drug review pharmoeconomic review report for Nucala[R/ OL]. (2023-02-27) [2025-06-20]. https://www.cda-amc.ca/mepolizumab-2.

23. 王建军, 宦耀东, 田肇敏, 等. 生物制剂治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的研究进展[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2024, 46(4): 339-345. [Wang JJ, Huan YD, Tian ZM, et al. Research progress of biologics in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps[J]. Journal of Dalian Medical University, 2024, 46(4): 339-345.] DOI: 10.11724/jdmu.2024.04.09.

24. Tsetsos N, Goudakos JK, Daskalakis D, et al. Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review[J]. Rhinology, 2018, 56(1): 11-21.DOI: 10.4193/Rhino17.156.

25. Cergan R, Berghi ON, Dumitru M, et al. Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis-a modern option for therapy[J]. Life, 2023, 13(11): 2165. DOI: 10.3390/life13112165.

26. 徐艳华, 王怡玮, 郭胤仕. 度普利尤单抗联合美泊利珠单抗治疗奥马珠单抗未控制哮喘合并慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉一例报告[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志, 2023, 17(5): 444-449. [Xu YH, Wang YW, Guo YS. A case report of dupilumab combined with mepolizumab in the treatment of uncontrolled asthma complicated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps after omalizumab failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, 2023, 17(5): 444-449.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8705.2023.05.009.

27. 国家医疗保障局, 人力资源社会保障部. 国家医保局, 人力资源社会保障部印发2024年版国家医保药品目录[EB/OL]. (2024-11-28) [2025-07-30]. https://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2024/11/28/art_14_14884.html.

28. Bachert C, Zhang N, Hellings PW, et al. Endotype-driven care pathways in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2018, 141(5): 1543-1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018. 03.004.

Popular papers
Last 6 months