Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 35,2026 No.2 Detail

Post-authorisation safety evaluation of extracorporeal blood circuit based on literature and MAUDE database

Published on Feb. 27, 2026Total Views: 35 times Total Downloads: 10 times Download Mobile

Author: LI Kaili 1 ZENG Baoqi 1, 2, 3 HUANG Ling 4 WANG Qiping 4 SUN Feng 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

Affiliation: 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China 2. Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China 3. Central Laboratory, Tianjin Fiſth Central Hospital (Binhai Hospital of Peking University), Tianjin 300450, China 4. Center for Pharmacovigilance of Hainan Province, Hainan 570100, China 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China 6. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830017, China 7. School of Public Health, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China 8. Hainan Institute of Real World Data, Hainan 571437, China

Keywords: Extracorporeal blood circuit Adverse events Literature search Signal detection Product quality Connection problems Operational technique

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202510009

Reference: LI Kaili, ZENG Baoqi, HUANG Ling, WANG Qiping, SUN Feng. Post-authorisation safety evaluation of extracorporeal blood circuit based on literature and MAUDE database[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2026, 35(2): 173-181. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202510009.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the adverse event and its potential causes associated with extracorporeal blood circuit during clinical use, providing recommendations for the safe clinical use of medical devices.

Methods  A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases including SinoMed, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data. The search period was from 1 January 2010 to 25 July 2025. The study collected adverse events associated with the clinical application of extracorporeal circulation blood circuits in blood purification devices, summarizing the types and causes of these adverse events. To further characterize device-related risks, pharmacovigilance signal detection was performed on the contemporaneous U.S. FDA MAUDE database utilizing three disproportionality analysis methods: the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the gamma-Poisson shrinker (GPS).

Results  A total of 9 articles were included. The primary risks identified during clinical use of the extracorporeal blood circuit were connection-related issues, including connection failure, difficult separation, poor sealing, disconnection, and accessory detachment. Literature analysis revealed that product quality issues were the primary cause of device failure, accounting for 46.6% of reported incidents; operational factors were the second most common cause. In the MAUDE database, 642 device adverse event records and 523 patient adverse event records were retrieved, signal detection identified 13 positive signals.

Conclusions  Connection problems represent the most frequent type of device-related adverse event associated with extracorporeal blood circuits. These are mainly attributable to product quality defects, with technical operation being another significant contributing factor. Manufacturers should strengthen quality control across the entire production-to-transportation process, improve packaging design to prevent component detachment, and include clear warnings regarding secondary fastening checks. Healthcare staff should develop individualized treatment protocols and continuously enhance operational proficiency in blood purification techniques to collectively reduce the incidence of related adverse events.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.国家药品监督管理局. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2020年)[EB/OL]. (2021-03-29) [2026-01-14]. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/fgwj/gzwj/gzwjylqx/20210329170305102.html.

2.国家药品监督管理局. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2019年)[EB/OL]. (2020-04-29) [2026-01-14]. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/xxgk/ggtg/ylqxggtg/ylqxqtggtg/20200429154301301.html.

3.国家药品不良反应监测中心. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2024年)[EB/OL]. (2025-07-31) [2026-01-14]. https://www.cdr-adr.org.cn/ylqx_1/Medical_aqjs/Medical_aqjs_sjbg/202505/t20250519_51128.html.

4.国家药品不良反应监测中心. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2023年)[EB/OL]. (2024-10-18) [2026-01-14]. https://www.cdr-adr.org.cn/ylqx_1/Medical_aqjs/Medical_aqjs_sjbg/202410/t20241018_50898.html.

5.国家药品不良反应监测中心. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2022年)[EB/OL]. (2023-04-07) [2026-01-14]. https://www.cdr-adr.org.cn/center_news/202304/t20230407_ 50048.html.

6.国家药品不良反应监测中心. 国家医疗器械不良事件监测年度报告(2021年)[EB/OL]. (2022-03-15) [2026-01-14]. https://www.cdr-adr.org.cn/ylqx_1/Medical_aqjs/Medical_aqjs_sjbg/202203/t20220315_49552.html.

7.国家市场监督管理总局. 医疗器械分类规则[EB/OL]. (2015-07-14) [2025-09-28]. https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/bgt/art/2023/art_24dbff6e15494c9cb112ea15ed158001.html.

8.国家药品监督管理局医疗器械技术审评中心. 一次性使用血液透析管路注册审查指导原则(2024年修订版)[R/OL]. (2024-08-12) [2025-09-30]. https://www.ydcmdei.org.cn/article/509.

9.黄凌, 王启平, 邱嘉珉, 等. 真实世界研究用于支持医疗器械上市后安全性评价研究进展[J]. 中国食品药品监管, 2024, (10): 58-67. [Huang L, Wang QP, Qiu JM, et al. Research progress of applying real-world study in post-market safety evaluation of medical devices[J]. China Food & Drug Administration Magazine, 2024, (10): 58-67.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5390.2024.10.007.

10.聂晓璐, 王胜锋, 姚晨, 等. 国内外真实世界数据/证据的相关药械监管政策法规及指导原则比较研究[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 5-12, 49. [Nie XL, Wang SF, Yao C, et al. Comparative study of Chinese and foreign policies, regulations and guidance for real world data/evidence for drugs and devices regulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2022, 31(1): 5-12, 49.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issnl005-0698. 2022.01.001.

11.玄怡, 黄琳, 赵玉娟, 等. 山东省血液净化体外循环血路风险分析[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2022, 43(12): 68-71, 99. [Xuan Y, Huang L, Zhao YJ, et al. Risk analysis of hemodialysis extracorporeal circulation blood circuit in Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Medical Equipment Journal, 2022, 43(12): 68-71, 99.] DOI: 10.19745/j.1003-8868.2022254.

12.国家卫生健康委员会. 卫生部关于印发《血液净化标准操作规程(2010版)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2010-01-25) [2025-09-30]. https://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/gfxwj/201002/d3061c7aee1b49cc884b26921c2a895f.shtml.

13.Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1998, 54(4): 315-321. DOI: 10.1007/s002280050466.

14.Dumouchel W. Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA apontaneous reporting system[J]. Amn Stat, 1999, 53(3): 177-190. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.1999.10474456.

15.张成亮, 严嘉伟. 故障树分析法在体外循环血液管路不良事件中的应用[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2016, 31(5): 121-123. [Zhang CL, Yan JW. Application of fault tree analysis in adverse events of extracorporeal circulation blood line[J]. China Medical Devices, 2016, 31(5): 121-123.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633. 2016.05.034.

16.马博, 马晨曦, 李昊, 等. 血液透析机预防性维护对设备不良事件故障发生情况的改善成果[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2025, 31(1): 168-171. [Ma B, Ma CX, Li H, et al. Preventive maintenance of hemodialysis machine to improve the occurrence of adverse event failure[J]. China Medical Device Information, 2025, 31(1): 168-171.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6586.2025.01.050.

17.李雪梅, 何筱娴, 陈文璇, 等. 维持性血液透析过程中不同护理方法的比较[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2010, 16(22): 2788-2790. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2010.22.037.

18.丁丽, 高媛媛, 焦芳. 血液透析室不良事件原因分析及防范对策研究[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2023, (20): 27-28, 45. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI2MDExMjE3MDQyNhIRendueGpreWoyMDIzMjAwMTEaCHdueHV2ZDlz.

19.Fajardo C, Sanchez CP, Cutler D, et al. Inpatient citrate-based hemodialysis in pediatric patients[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2016, 31(10): 1667-1672. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3403-8.

20.Sathe KP, Yeo WS, Liu ID, et al. Recurrent white thrombi formation in hemodialysis tubing: a case report clinical research[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2015, 16: 3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-16-3.

21.阮孟珠. 298例血液透析突发事件的发生原因分析及对策 [J]. 浙江医学教育, 2011, 10(2): 32-33. [Ruan MZ. Analysis of the causes of 298 unexpected events in hemodialysis and its preventive countermeasures[J]. Zhejiang Medical Education, 2011, 10(2): 32-33.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0024.2011.02.013.

22.叶永福, 韩伟, 王洪颖, 等. 层级全责一体化护理模式在血液透析中心护理质量管理中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2019, 25(21): 51-53. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2019.21.016.

23.Vanommeslaeghe F, Van Biesen W, François K. Detection and scoring of extracorporeal circuit clotting during hemodialysis[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2023, 43(6): 151474. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol. 2023.151474.

24.李墨奇, 王代红, 何文昌, 等. 降低血液透析患者体外循环凝血发生率[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2019, 26(1): 91-95, 108. [Li MQ, Wang DH, He WC, et al. Decreasing the incidence of the extracorporeal circulation coagulation in hemodialysis patients[J]. Chinese Health Quality Management, 2019, 26(1): 91-95, 108.] DOI: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.1.27.

Popular papers
Last 6 months