Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 34,2025 No.6 Detail

Signals mining and analysis of adverse drug events of anifrolumab based on FAERS database

Published on Jun. 27, 2025Total Views: 47 times Total Downloads: 15 times Download Mobile

Author: YAN Fanbin WANG Jia XU Lujie LIU Chang

Affiliation: Department of Pharmacy, Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China

Keywords: Anifrolumab Adverse drug events Signal mining Ratio imbalance method Pharmacovigilance

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202501023

Reference: YAN Fanbin, WANG Jia, XU Lujie, LIU Chang. Signals mining and analysis of adverse drug events of anifrolumab based on FAERS database[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2025,34(6): 650-656. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202501023.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To explore the adverse drug event (ADE) signals of anifrolumab, and to provide references for clinical safe medication.

Methods  The ADE reports related to anifrolumab from the third quarter of 2021 to the third quarter of 2024 in the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were collected. The report odds ratio (ROR) method, the comprehensive standard method of the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and the Bayesian Confidence Interval Progressive Neural Network (BCPNN) method were employed to identify ADE signals related to anifrolumab. System-organ class (SOC) and preferred term in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities were used for data classification and statistics.

Results  A total of 1,186 ADE reports with anifrolumab as the primary suspected drug were collected, and 49 signals were identified, involving 14 SOCs. The top 3 SOCs in terms of report frequency ranking were general disorders and administration site reactions, infections and infestations, and nervous system disorders. The top 3 ADEs in terms of report frequency ranking were headache, joint pain, and herpes zoster. Vasculitis, pericarditis, proteinuria, and blood pressure abnormalities were suspected ADEs not documented in the specification and were also ADE signals with a high signal strength ranking.

Conclusion  The common ADE signals of anifrolumab are consistent with its drug instructions. However, when using anifrolumab in clinical practice, it is also necessary to be vigilant against the increase of various infectious diseases such as herpes zoster and new ADEs not included in the instructions such as pericarditis, to ensure the safety of patients' medication.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.中华医学会风湿病学分会, 国家皮肤与免疫疾病临床医学研究中心, 中国系统性红斑狼疮研究协作组. 2020中国系统性红斑狼疮诊疗指南[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(3): 172-185. [Chinese Society of Rheumatology, National Clinical Research Center for Skin and Immunological Diseases, Chinese Cooperative Group on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. 2020 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2020, 59(3): 172-185.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2020.03.002.

2.沈南, 赵毅, 段利华, 等. 系统性红斑狼疮诊疗规范[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2023, 62(7): 775-784. [Shen N, Zhao Y, Duan LH, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2023, 62(7): 775-784.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20221027-00793.

3.中国狼疮肾炎诊断和治疗指南编写组. 中国狼疮肾炎诊断和治疗指南[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(44): 3441-3455. [The Chinese Lupus Nephritis Diagnosis and Treatment Guideline Writing Group. Chinese lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment guidelines[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2019, 99(44): 3441-3455.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.44.001.

4.耿研, 武丽君, 谢其冰, 等. 生物制剂在系统性红斑狼疮中应用的中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2024, 28(2): 78-92. [Geng Y, Wu LJ, Xie QB, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the application of biologics in systemic lupus erythematosus (2024 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Rheumatology, 2024, 28(2): 78-92.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn141217-20230711-00190-1.

5.麦尔哈巴·麦提亚尔, 黄文辉, 黄成辉, 等. 阿尼鲁单抗治疗系统性红斑狼疮的研究进展[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2023, 27(6): 413-417. [Melhaba M, Huang WH, Huang CH, et al. Research progress on aniludong antibody treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Chinese Journal of Rheumatology, 2023, 27(6): 413-417.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn141217-20221004-00413.

6.Mullard A. FDA approves AstraZeneca's anifrolumab for lupus[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2021, 20(9): 658. DOI: 10.1038/d41573-021-00139-y.

7.Kirou KA, Dall Era M, Aranow C, et al. Belimumab or anifrolumab for systemic lupus erythematosus? A risk-benefit assessment[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 980079. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.980079.

8.罗宝章, 钱轶峰, 叶小飞, 等. 药物不良反应信号检测方法的现状与展望[J]. 药学服务与研究, 2009, 9(4): 255-260. [Luo BZ, Qian YF, Ye XF, et al. Current status and prospect of signal detection methods for adverse drug reactions[J]. Pharmaceutical Services and Research,2009, 9(4): 255-260.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2838.2009.04.018.

9.刘姗姗, 陈果, 刘笑, 等. 基于FAERS数据库的加卡奈珠单抗不良事件信号挖掘与分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2024, 33(8): 860-868. [Liu SS, Chen G, Liu X, et al. Signal mining and analysis for adverse drug events of galcanezumab based on FAERS database[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2024, 33(8): 860-868.] DO1: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202404018.

10.Rothman KJ, Lanes S, Sacks ST. The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2004, 13(8): 519-523. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1001.

11.Hou Y, Ye X, Wu G, et al. A comparison of disproportionality analysis methods in national adverse drug reaction databases of China[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2014, 13(7): 853-857. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.915938.

12.Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1998, 54(4): 315-321. DOI: 10.1007/s002280050466.

13.Guan Y, Ji L, Zheng L, et al. Development of a drug risk analysis and assessment system and its application in signal excavation and analysis of 263 cases of fluoroquinolone-induced adverse reactions[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 892503. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.892503.

14.Morand EF, Furie R, Tanaka Y, et al. Trial of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(3): 211-221. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912196.

15.李梦涛, 曾小峰. 系统性红斑狼疮: 推进早期诊断, 达标治疗, 改善长期预后[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(3): 169-171. [Li MT, Zeng XF. Systemic lupus erythematosus: advancing early diagnosis, achieving standard treatment, and improving long-term prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2020, 59(3): 169-171.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2020.03.001.

16.李莉, 杨卓, 蔡江晖, 等. 基于FARES数据库的贝利尤单抗ADE风险信号挖掘[J]. 中国药房, 2021, 32(24): 3024-3030. [Li L, Yang Z, Cai JH, et al. Mining of belimumab ADE risk signals based on the FARES database[J]. China Pharmacy, 2021, 32(24): 3024-3030.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2021.24.14.

17.李浩, 李江涛, 刘丹, 等. 贝利尤单抗和阿尼鲁单抗及泰它西普治疗系统性红斑狼疮疗效和安全性的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中国全科医学, 1-11. [2025-06-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/13.1222.R.20240704.1510.012.html.

18.Kalunian KC, Furie R, Morand EF, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase Ⅲ extension trial of the long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2023, 75(2): 253-265. DOI: 10.1002/art.42392.

19.Furie RA, Morand EF, Bruce IN, et al. Type I interferon inhibitor anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (TULIP-1): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Rheumatol, 2019, 1(4): e208-e219. DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30076-1.

20.Kirou KA, Dall Era M, Aranow C, et al. Belimumab or anifrolumab for systemic lupus erythematosus? A risk-benefit assessment[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 980079. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.980079.

21.卓羽波, 欧阳珊. 1例重度系统性红斑狼疮伴难治性高血压患儿使用贝利尤单抗的药学监护[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2024, 30(12): 62-64. [Zhuo YB, Ouyang S. Pharmaceutical care for a child with severe systemic lupus erythematosus and refractory hypertension treated with belimumab[J]. Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy, 2024, 30(12): 62-64.] DOI: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2024.12.016.

22.Jesus D, Matos A, Henriques C, et al. Derivation and validation of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78(3): 365-371. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214502.

Popular papers
Last 6 months