Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 34,2025 No.5 Detail

Clinical characteristics and drug resistance analysis of 408 patients with Escherichia coli bloodstream infection

Published on May. 29, 2025Total Views: 88 times Total Downloads: 21 times Download Mobile

Author: HU Peng 1, 2 CAI Tongjian 2 WANG Yi 2 CHENG Yao 2 LIU Qiuqian 2 XIAO Hong 1

Affiliation: 1. School of Public Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China 2. Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China

Keywords: Bloodstream infection Escherichia coli Extended-spectrum β-lactamases Clinical features Drug resistance

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202503182

Reference: HU Peng, CAI Tongjian, WANG Yi, CHENG Yao, LIU Qiuqian, XIAO Hong. Clinical characteristics and drug resistance analysis of 408 patients with Escherichia coli bloodstream infection[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2025, 34(5): 507-514. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202503182.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To study the risk factors and strain resistance of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing bloodstream infection, so as to provide clinical basis for rational use of antibiotics and effective prevention and control of bloodstream infection.

Methods  The clinical data of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli in a tertiary hospital in Chongqing from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. The clinical characteristics and drug resistance of bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli were statistically analysed. According to the ESBL confirmation test of Escherichia coli strains, the patients were divided into the ESBL-producing group and the non-ESBL-producing group. The chi-square test was used to compare the differences in influencing factors between the two groups, and then the independent influencing factors of ESBL production were analyzed through multivariate Logistic regression.  

Results  A total of 408 patients were included. The detection rate of ESBL-producing strains was 60.3% (246/408), and the detection rates in the nephrology department and the intensive care unit were relatively high (both>76.0%). Diabetes [OR=1.98, 95%CI (1.24, 3.17)] and urinary tract intubation [OR=1.60,95%CI (1.02, 2.51)] were independent influencing factors for bloodstream infection with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. The resistance rate of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli to levofloxacin and ceftriaxone was >90.0%. Moreover, the resistance rates of the second-generation cephalosporins (except ceftazidime), compound sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin and amtronam were significantly higher than those in the non-ESBL-producing group (P<0.05). Both groups of strains showed high sensitivity to amikacin and carbapenem drugs.

Conclusion  The  severe current situation of bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in this region showing a high prevalence of drug resistance characteristics. Diabetes and urinary tract intubation, as independent risk factors, suggest that key monitoring should be implemented for such high-risk populations in clinical practice. Given that ESBL-producing strains remain sensitive to carbapenems and amikacin, it can be recommended as the first empirical medication. It is of great public health significance to achieve the effect of curbing the spread of such multi-drug resistant bacteria by establishing an early warning system based on risk factor assessment and standardized management of invasive operations.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Song Y, Gyarmati P. Optimized detection of bacteria in bloodstream infections[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(6): e0219086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219086.

2.Zhang S, Sun X, Lei Y. The microbiological characteristics and risk factors for PICC-related bloodstream infections in intensive care unit[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 15074. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10037-2.

3.Han YY, Lin YC, Cheng WC, et al. Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacteria from patients' blood via assaying bacterial metabolic response with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 12538. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68855-w.

4.Diekema DJ, Hsueh PR, Mendes RE, et al. The microbiology of bloodstream infection: 20-year trends from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2019, 63(7): e00355-e00419. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00355-19.

5.Ishnaiwer M, Le Bastard Q, Naour M, et al. Efficacy of an inulin-based treatment on intestinal colonization by multidrug-resistant E. coli: insight into the mechanism of action[J]. Gut Microbes, 2024, 16(1): 2347021. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2347021.

6.Afema JA, Davis MA, Sischo WM. Antimicrobial use policy change in pre-weaned dairy calves and its impact on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli: a cross sectional and ecological study[J]. BMC Microbiol, 2019, 19(1): 217. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1576-6.

7.Baek YJ, Kim YA, Kim D, et al. Risk factors for extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in community-onset bloodstream infection: impact on long-term care hospitals in Korea [J]. Ann Lab Med, 2021, 41(5): 455-462. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.455.

8.Niu T, Xiao T, Guo L, et al. Retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections: cefoperazone-sulbactam associated with resistance and tigecycline increased the mortality[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2018, 11: 2021-2030. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S169432.

9.周庭银, 倪语星, 主编. 临床微生物检验标准化操作规程, 第2版[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2010: 379-406.

10.全国细菌耐药监测网. 2022年全国细菌耐药监测报告(简要版)[R/OL]. (2023-11-20) [2025-04-30]. https://www.carss.cn/Report/Details/917.

11.Tian L, Sun Z, Zhang Z. Antimicrobial resistance of pathogens causing nosocomial bloodstream infection in Hubei province, China, from 2014 to 2016: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. BMC Public Health, 2018, 18(1): 1121. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6013-5.

12.Xie K, Neff F, Markert A, et al. Every-other-day feeding extends lifespan but fails to delay many symptoms of aging in mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1): 155. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00178-3.

13.庄晓晶, 丁海燕, 林晓荣. 2型糖尿病合并血流感染者临床特征和病原菌分布[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 328-333. [Zhuang XJ, Ding HY, Lin XR. Clinical characteristics and pathogenic bacteria distribution in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with blood flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases (Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(4): 328-333.] DOI: 10.3877/cma.J.iSSN.1674-1358.2019.04.012.

14.Pollonini L, Gulley Cox L, Gorniak SL. Hemodynamic function of forearm muscle in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes[J]. J Aging Phys Act, 2020, 28(5): 723-730. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2019-0221.

15.Montassier E, Batard E, Gastinne T, et al. Recent changes in bacteremia in patients with cancer: a systematic review of epidemiology and antibiotic resistance[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2013, 32(7): 841-850. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-013-1819-7.

16.Liu T, Wang J, Yuan Y, et al. Early warning of bloodstream infection in elderly patients with circulating microparticles [J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2021, 11(1): 110. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00901-w.

17.Muriuki CW, Ogonda LA, Kyanya C, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Kenya[J]. Microb Drug Resist, 2022, 28(1): 31-38.DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0432.

18.Yazdanpour Z, Tadjrobehkar O, Shahkhah M. Significant association between genes encoding virulence factors with antibiotic resistance and phylogenetic groups in community acquired uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates[J]. BMC Microbiol, 2020, 20(1): 241. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-01933-1.

19.Da Silva P, Lustri BC, Castilho IG, et al. Genome profiling of fluoroquinolone-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Brazil[J]. Braz J Microbiol, 2021, 52(3): 1067-1075. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-021-00513-3.

20.Zaheer R, Cook SR, Barbieri R, et al. Surveillance of Enterococcus spp. reveals distinct species and antimicrobial resistance diversity across a One-Health continuum[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 3937. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69044-5.

21.Qekwana DN, Sebola D, Oguttu JW, et al. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus species isolated from cats presented at a veterinary academic hospital in South Africa[J]. BMC Vet Res, 2017, 13(1): 286. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1204-3.

22.Patil RK, Kabera B, Muia CK, et al. Hospital acquired infections in a private paediatric hospital in Kenya: a retrospective cross-sectional study[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2022, 41: 28. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.28.25820.

23.El Sherif HM, Elsayed M, El-Ansary MR, et al. BioFire film array BCID2 versus VITEK-2 system in determining microbial etiology and antibiotic-resistant genes of pathogens recovered from central line-associated bloodstream infections[J]. Biology (Basel), 2022, 11(11): 1573. DOI: 10.3390/biology11111573.

24.Hernández-Quiles R, Merino-Lucas E, Boix V, et al. Bacteraemia and quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are independent risk factors for long-term mortality in very elderly patients with suspected infection: retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2022, 22(1): 248. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07242-4.

25.Bazaid AS, Barnawi H, Qanash H, et al. Bacterial coinfection and antibiotic resistance profiles among hospitalised COVID-19 patients[J]. Microorganisms, 2022, 10(3): 495. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10030495.

Popular papers
Last 6 months