Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 35,2026 No.5 Detail

Environmental chemical exposure and antidepressant efficacy: mechanisms and advances in precision pharmacology prediction models

Published on May. 28, 2026Total Views: 61 times Total Downloads: 18 times Download Mobile

Author: WANG Pei 1 CHEN Wanying 2 SHANG Nan 3 ZHANG Ruifen 1

Affiliation: 1. Clinical Trial Management Office, Linfen Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Linfen 041000, Shanxi Province, China 2. School of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China 3. Department of Pharmacy, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China

Keywords: Antidepressants Environmental exposure Blood-brain barrier Drug efficacy Envir-onmental chemical pollutants Precision pharmacology

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202512134

Reference: Wang P, Chen WY, Shang N, et al. Environmental chemical exposure and antidepressant efficacy: mechanisms and advances in precision pharmacology prediction models[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2026, 35(5): 579-588. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202512134.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Significant inter-individual variability exists in antidepressant treatment response. Beyond genetic and clinical determinants, lifelong cumulative exposure to environmental chemical pollutants has emerged as an important exogenous factor. However, existing studies largely remain at the level of associations between environmental exposure and depression risk, lacking a systematic ex-planation of its impact on the antidepressant treatment process from an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic  perspective. This review aims to systematically summarize the mechanisms by which environmental chemical exposures influence antidepressant efficacy from a translational pharmacology perspective, and to explore their integration into predictive models for individualized treatment response. Existing evidence suggests that heavy metals, air pollutants, and persistent organic pollutants can induce oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, disrupt blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity—particularly via endothelial gly-cocalyx damage—and modulate the activity of drug transporters (e.g., P-glycoprotein) and metabolizing enzymes (e.g., cytochrome P450). These alter-ations may affect drug disposition in the body, reduce central nervous system exposure, and lead to a decoupling between plasma drug concentration and therapeutic response. Such processes can be conceptualized as cumulative drug-environment interactions. Building on this framework, environmental exposure indicators may serve as novel predictive dimensions and can be integrated with pharmacogenomics, biomarkers, and clinical features using machine learning approaches (e.g., random forest, XGBoost) to develop individualized antidepressant efficacy prediction models. By proposing an integrated framework linking environmental exposure, BBB function, pharmacokinetics, and treatment outcomes, this review provides a novel perspective for understanding variability in antidepressant efficacy and offers potential pathways toward precision psychopharmacology. Future studies should address challenges related to exposure assessment standardization, causal re-lationship validation, and clinical translation.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet Psychiatry, 2022, 9(2): 137-150. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3.

2.Lu J, Xu X, Huang Y, et al. Prevalence of depressive disorders and treatment in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study[J].Lancet Psychiatry, 2021, 8(11): 981-990. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00251-0.

3.尉力文, 陈旭鹏, 严子康, 等. 1990—2019年中国人群精神障碍疾病负担变化趋势及危险因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2024, 41(4): 511-516. [Wei LW, Chen XP, Yan ZK, et al. Trends of burden on mental disorders and tis related risk fanctors in China, from 1990 to 2019[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2024, 41(4): 511-516.] DOI: 10.11783/j.issn.1002-3674.2024.04.007.

4.Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2006, 163(1): 28-40. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.

5.司天梅, 王振, 李凌江. 抗抑郁药品临床综合评价专家共识 [J]. 中国药房, 2023, 34(13): 1547-1554. [Si TM, Wang Z, Li LJ. Expert consensus on comprehensive clinical evaluation of antidepressant drugs[J]. China Pharmacy, 2023, 34(13): 1547-1554.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.13.02.

6.Al-Harbi KS. Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2012, 6: 369-388. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S29716.

7.Bousman CA, Stevenson JM, Ramsey LB, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, SLC6A4, and HTR2A genotypes and serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2023, 114(1): 51-68. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2903.

8.Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2012, 41(1): 24-32. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyr236.

9.Gutierrez-Ortiz C, Hossain B, Dessenne C, et al. Role of the exposome in mental disorders: a scoping review protocol [J]. BMJ Open, 2025, 15(8): e101575. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101575.

10.Arias-Magnasco A, Lin BD, Pries LK, et al. Mapping the exposome of mental health: exposome-wide association study of mental health outcomes among UK Biobank participants[J]. Psychol Med, 2025, 55: e16. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724003015.

11.Doğan MK, Guloksuz S. Mapping the exposome of mental health outcomes to enhance population salutogenesis[J]. Alpha Psychiatry, 2025, 26(3): 44314. DOI: 10.31083/AP44314.

12.Bouchard MF, Bellinger DC, Weuve J, et al. Blood lead levels and major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder in US young adults[J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2009, 66(12):1313-1319. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry. 2009.164.

13.Branca JJV, Morucci G, Pacini A. Cadmium-induced neurotoxicity: still much ado[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2018, 13(11): 1879-1882. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.239434.

14.Gaum PM, Gube M, Schettgen T, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls and depression: cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of a dopamine-related neurochemical path in the German HELPcB surveillance program[J]. Environ Health, 2017, 16(1): 106. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0316-3.

15.Shi LZ, Zheng W. Early lead exposure increases the leakage of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, in vitro[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2007, 26(3): 159-167. DOI: 10.1177/0960327107070560.

16.叶旋, 王宇光, 高月. 芳基烃受体及其转录调控的细胞色素P4501A在环境污染物所致毒性中的作用 [J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2008, 22(4): 316-320. [Ye X, Wang YG, Gao Y. Roles of aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulating cytochrome P-450 1A in toxic responses caused by environmental pollutants[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2008, 22(4): 316-320.] DOI: 10.3867/j.issn.1000-3002.2008.04.013.

17.Kim HJ, Kim JH, Lee S, et al. PM2.5 exposure triggers hypothalamic oxidative and ER stress leading to depressive-like behaviors in rats[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(24):13527.DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413527.

18.徐焰. 紧密连接蛋白在铅诱导的血脑屏障损伤中的作用及调控机制[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2013.DOI:10.7666/d.D357373.

19.Kadry H, Noorani B, Cucullo L. A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity[J]. Fluids Barriers CNS, 2020, 17(1): 69. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-020-00230-3.

20.Zahoor SM, Ishaq S, Ahmed T. Neurotoxic effects of metals on blood brain barrier impairment and possible therapeutic approaches[J]. Vitam Horm, 2024, 126:1-24. DOI: 10.1016/bs.vh.2024.04.003.

21.聂蔓青, 谢天成, 郑波, 等. 中国川渝地区人群的铅、砷、汞和镉暴露:以直接法和间接法获得的参考区间对比研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2025, 56(2): 442-450. [Nie MQ, Xie TC, Zheng B, et al. Exposure to lead, arsenic, mercury, and cadmium in populations in Sichuan and Chongqing:a comparative study of reference intervals derived from direct and indirect sampling methods[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2025, 56(2): 442-450.] DOI: 10.12182/20250360604.

22.Shou Y, Huang Y, Zhu X, et al. A review of the possible associations between ambient PM2.5 exposures and the development of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2019, 174: 344-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.086.

23.Brooks AW, Sandri BJ, Nixon JP, et al. Neuroinflammation and brain health risks in veterans exposed to burn pit toxins[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(18): 9759. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25189759.

24.Sangkham S, Phairuang W, Sherchan S, et al. An update on adverse health effects from exposure to PM2.5[J]. Environ Adv, 2024, 18: 100603. DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100603.

25.Maes M, Galecki P, Chang YS, et al. A review on the oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) pathways in major depression and their possible contribution to the (neuro)degenerative processes in that illness[J]. Prog Neu-ropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry, 2010, 35(3): 676-692. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.004.

26.Rezaei K, Mastali G, Abbasgholinejad E, et al.Cadmium neurotoxicity:insights into behavioral effect and neurodegenerative diseases[J].Chemosphere, 2024, 364: 143180. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143180.

27.Rahman HH, Stokey WR, Munson-McGee SH. Depression outcomes correlated to exposure to per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2025, 32(36): 21413-21432. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-025-36917-z.

28.Vert C, Sánchez-Benavides G, Martínez D, et al. Effect of long-term exposure to air pollution on anxiety and depression in adults: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2017, 220(6): 1074-1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.06.009.

29.Hu Y, Niu Z, Eckel SP, et al. Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution and persistent postpartum depression [J]. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 953: 176089. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176089.

30.Jacobson MH, Ghassabian A, Gore AC, et al. Exposure to environmental chemicals and perinatal psychopathology[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2021, 195: 114835. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114835.

31.Song H, Zheng G, Shen XF, et al. Reduction of brain barrier tight junctional proteins by lead exposure: role of activation of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src via chaperon GRP78[J]. Toxicol Sci, 2014, 138(2): 393-402. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu007.

32.Lv Y, Chen Y, Gao Z, et al. Diesel exhaust particles induced blood-brain barrier dysfunction through inflammation, oxidative stress, and activation of the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway[J]. Neurotoxicolo-gy,2025,110:122-131.DOI:10.1016/j.neuro. 2025.08.002.

33.Press MF. Lead-induced permeability changes in immature vessels of the developing cerebellar microcirculation[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 1985, 67(1-2): 86-95. DOI: 10.1007/BF00688128.

34.Sanchez-Cano F, Hernández-Kelly LC, Ortega A. The blood-brain barrier: much more than a selective access to the brain[J]. Neurotox Res, 2021, 39(6): 2154-2174. DOI: 10.1007/s12640-021-00431-0.

35.Peixoto-Rodrigues MC, Monteiro-Neto JR, Teglas T, et al. Early-life exposure to PCBs and PFAS exerts negative effects on the developing central nervous system[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2024, 485: 136832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136832.

36.Cao J, Lei Y, Li W, et al. Coupled digital visualization and multi-omics uncover neurobehavioral dysfunction in zebrafish induced by resorcinol bis(diphenylphosphate)[J]. Environ Int, 2024, 192: 109023. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109023.

37.Gao HT, Zhou HQ, Ji HN, et al. From exposure to neurotoxicity induced by micro-nanoplastics with brain accumulation and cognitive decline[J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2025, 304: 119114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.119114.

38.Daniyarova KR, Sarkulova ZN, Tamadon A, et al. Glycocalyx and endothelial biomarkers as prognostic indicators in sepsis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Microbiologyopen, 2025, 14(6): e70155. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.70155.

39.Inoda A, Suzuki K, Tomita H, et al. Glycocalyx shedding as a clinical biomarker in critical illness[J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2025, 144: 104997. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2025.104997.

40.Andersen HG, DellaValle B, Bøgehave H, et al. Glycocalyx shedding patterns identifies antipsychotic-naïve patients with first-episode psychosis[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2024, 339: 116037. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116037.

41.Figueiredo Godoy AC, Frota FF, Araújo LP, et al. Neuroinflammation and natural antidepressants: balancing fire with flora[J]. Biomedicines, 2025, 13(5): 1121. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines 13051129.

42.刘永敏, 夏玉凤. CYP450底物、抑制剂、诱导剂及种属特异性的研究进展[J]. 药物资讯, 2023, 12(2): 70-80. [Liu YM, Xia YF. Research progress of CYP450 substrates, inhibitors, inducers and species specificity[J]. Pharmacy Information, 2023, 12(2): 70-80.] DOI: 10.12677/pi.2023.122009.

43.English BA, Dortch M, Ereshefsky L, et al. Clinically significant psychotropic drug-drug interactions in the primary care setting [J]. Curr Psychiatry Rep, 2012, 14(4): 376-390. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-012-0284-9.

44.Milosavljevic F, Bukvic N, Pavlovic Z, et al. Association of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizer status with antidepressant and antipsychotic exposure: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2021, 78(3): 270-280. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3643.

45.Agarwal U, Pannu A, Tonk RK. Foreign contaminants target brain health[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2025, 24(5): 353-374. DOI: 10.2174/0118715273338071241213101016.

46.Pan J, Wei Y, Ni L, et al. Unbalanced ER-mitochondrial calcium homeostasis promotes mitochondrial dysfunction and associated apoptotic pathways activation in methylmercury exposed rat cortical neurons[J]. J Biochem Mol Toxicol, 2022, 36(9): e23136. DOI: 10.1002/jbt.23136.

47.Fonken LK, Xu X, Weil ZM, et al. Air pollution impairs cognition, provokes depressive-like behaviors and alters hippocampal cytokine expression and morphology[J]. Mol Psychiatry, 2011, 16(10): 973-987. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2011.76.

48.Mazereeuw G, Herrmann N, Andreazza AC, et al. A Meta-analysis of lipid peroxidation markers in major depression[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2015, 11: 2479-2491. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S89922.

49.Liu T, Zhong S, Liao X, et al. A Meta-analysis of oxidative stress markers in depression[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0138904. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138904.

50.Jiménez-Fernández S, Gurpegui M, Garrote-Rojas D, et al. Oxidative stress parameters and antioxidants in patients with bipolar disorder: Results from a meta-analysis comparing patients, including stratification by polarity and euthymic status, with healthy controls[J]. Bipolar Disord, 2020, 23(2): 117-129. DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12980.

51.Wang X, Wang C, Zhang Y, et al. Effect of pharmacogenomics testing guiding on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of RCT[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2023, 23(1): 334. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04756-2.

52.Ntam VA, Huebner T, Steffens M, et al. Machine learning approaches in the therapeutic outcome prediction in major depressive disorder: a systematic review[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2025, 16: 1588963. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1588963.

53.Vickers AJ, van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis[J]. Diagn Progn Res, 2019, 3: 18. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-019-0064-7.

54.Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models[J]. Med Decis Making, 2006, 26(6): 565-574. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361.

55.Xu Z, Vekaria V, Wang F, et al. Using machine learning to predict antidepressant treatment outcome from electronic health records[J]. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract, 2023, 5(4): 118-125. DOI: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20220015.

56.Athreya AP, Neavin D, Carrillo-Roa T,et al. Pharmacogenomics-driven prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes: a machine-learning approach with multi-trial replication[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 106(4): 855-865. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1482.

57.Yuan R, Liao Y, Lu X, et al. Advancing paroxetine treatment in depression: predicting remission and plasma concentration, and validating and updating therapeutic reference ranges[J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2025, 15(1): 321. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03503-3.

58.Lin E, Kuo PH, Liu YL, et al. Prediction of antidepressant treatment response and remission using an Ensemble machine learning framework[J]. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2020, 13(10):305. DOI: 10.3390/ph13100305.

59.Manzano-Covarrubias AL, Yan H, Luu MDA, et al. Unravelling the signaling power of pollutants[J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 44(12): 917-933. DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2023.09.002.

60.司书成, 吴柳柳, 王聪慧, 等. 大语言模型助力药物流行病学研究[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(9): 1074-1083. [Si SC, Wu LL, Wang CH, et al. Large language models empowering pharmacoepidemiology research[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(9): 1074-1083.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202504033.

61.Chua RXY, Tay MJY, Ooi DSQ, et al. Understanding the link between allergy and neurodevelopmental disorders:a current review of factors and mechanisms[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 11: 603571. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603571.

62.Bobb JF, Valeri L, Claus Henn B, et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures[J]. Biostatistics, 2014, 16(3): 493-508. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu058.

Popular papers
Last 6 months