Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 33,2024 No.3 Detail

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a Meta-analysis

Published on Apr. 02, 2024Total Views: 1109 times Total Downloads: 558 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHANG Xuepei 1 TANG Xiuneng 1 LI Na 1 LIAO Shasha 1 LIU Yunyuan 1 HE Guanlan 1 ZHANG Hongliang 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530000, China 2. Department of Pharmacy, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China

Keywords: Hydroxychloroquine Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome Live birth rate Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312014

Reference: ZHANG Xuepei, TANG Xiuneng, LI Na, LIAO Shasha, LIU Yunyuan, HE Guanlan,ZHANG Hongliang.Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a Meta-analysis[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2024, 33(3):330-341.DOI:10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312014.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS).

Methods  PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, Wanfang Data, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched electronically to collect clinical research on HCQ treatment for OAPS from inception to January 31, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, Meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation were performed using RevMan 5.4 software and GRADE Profile 3.6 softwares.

Results  Five cohort studies and three randomized controlled trias (RCTs) were included, with a total of 644 OAPS patients (732 pregnancies). The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, HCQ supplementation significantly increased the live birth rate of OAPS (RR=1.29, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.51, P=0.001), the negative conversion rate of lupus anticoagulant (RR=1.29, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.47, P<0.001), the anticardiolipin antibody negative conversion rate (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.45, P<0.001) and the anti-β2 glycoprotein Ⅰ antibody negative conversion rate (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.52, P<0.001), the rate of early abortion (<10 weeks) was significantly reduced (RR=0.31, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.93, P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in reducing the rate of premature birth, late abortion (>10 weeks) and the incidence of preeclampsia (P>0.05). In terms of safety analysis, two studies described HCQ adverse effects including skin reactions and dry eyes, symptoms are mild. Three RCTs were used to compare the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups, the incidence of adverse reaction of HCQ group was lower than that of control group (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.66, P<0.001), and no serious adverse reactions occurred in both groups. The sensitivity analysis results were robust and reliable. The results of GRADE evaluation showed that the quality of index evidence included in this study were low or very low, with weak recommendations.

Conclusion  HCQ can significantly improve the live birth rate of OAPS and the negative conversion rate of antiphospholipid antibody, and reduce the fetal abortion rate before 10 weeks with fewer adverse reactions, but there is insufficient evidence to reduce the incidence of premature birth, fetal abortion after 10 weeks and preeclampsia. Due to the limited number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.中华医学会围产医学分会. 产科抗磷脂综合征诊断与处理专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2020, 23(8): 517-522. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20200402-00299.

2.Schreiber K, Hunt BJ. Managing antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy[J]. Thromb Res, 2019, 181(Suppl 1): S41-S46. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(19)30366-4.

3.Tektonidou MG, Andreoli L, Limper M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78(10): 1296-1304. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215213.

4.Andreoli L, Bertsias GK, Agmon-Levin N, et al. EULAR recommendations for women's health and the management of family planning, assisted reproduction, pregnancy and menopause in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and/or antiphospholipid syndrome[J].Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76(3): 476-485. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209770.

5.Sammaritano LR, Bermas BL, Chakravarty EE, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the management of reproductive health in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases[J]. Arthritis Rheumatol, 2020, 72(4): 529-556. DOI: 10.1002/art.41191.

6.Limper M, de Leeuw K, Lely AT, et al. Diagnosing and treating antiphospholipid syndrome: a consensus paper[J]. Neth J Med, 2019, 77(3): 98-108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31012427/.

7.Alijotas-Reig J, Esteve-Valverde E, Anunciación-Llunell A, et al. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a comprehensive review[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(3): 675. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030675.

8.Cohen H, Cuadrado MJ, Erkan D, et al. 16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on antiphospholipid syndrome treatment trends[J]. Lupus, 2020, 29(12): 1571-1593. DOI: 10.1177/0961203 320950461.

9.Zhou Z, Teng J, Sun Y, et al. Characteristics of pregnancy complications and treatment in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome in China[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2019, 38(11): 3161-3168. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04670-7.

10.Santacruz JC, Mantilla MJ, Rueda I, et al. Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome from the perspective of a rheumatologist[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(1): e21090. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21090.

11.Chaturvedi S, McCrae KR. Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Blood Rev, 2017, 31(6): 406-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2017.07.006.

12.Schreiber K, Radin M, Sciascia S. Current insights in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 29(6): 397-403. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000406.

13.Mayer-Pickel K, Eberhard K, Lang U, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with obstetric and thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome-a retrospective analysis and a review of additional treatment in pregnancy[J]. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2017, 53(1): 54-67. DOI: 10.1007/s12016-016-8569-0.

14.张雪,李荣,漆洪波. 产科抗磷脂综合征[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(8): 581-583. [Zhang X, Li R, Qi HB. Antiphospholipid syndrome in obstetrics[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201, 37(8): 581-583.] https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SFCZ202108008.htm.

15.Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2006, 4(2): 295-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x.

16.Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022)[EB/OL]. (2022-08) [2023-06-05]. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.

17.Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.

18.Balshem H, Helfanda M, J. Schunemann H, et al. GRADE指南: Ⅲ. 证据质量分级[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(4): 451-455. [Balshem H, Helfanda M, J. Schunemann H, et al. GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the Quality of Evidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2011, 11(4): 451-455.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2011.04.017.

19.Latino JO, Udry S, Aranda F, et al. Risk factors for early severe preeclampsia in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome with conventional treatment. The impact of hydroxychloroquine[J]. Lupus, 2020, 29(13): 1736-1742. DOI: 10.1177/0961203320952850.

20.Liu J, Zhang L, Tian Y, et al. Protection by hydroxychloroquine prevents placental injury in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2022, 26(15): 4357-4370. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17459.

21.Sciascia S, Hunt BJ, Talavera-Garcia E, et al. The impact of hydroxychloroquine treatment on pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid antibodies[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214(2): 273. e1-273. e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.078.

22.Gerde M, Ibarra E, Mac Kenzie R, et al. The impact of hydroxychloroquine on obstetric outcomes in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Thromb Res, 2021, 206: 104-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.08.004.

23.连若纯,余姝毅,王晓晖,等. 硫酸羟氯喹联合抗凝药物治疗抗磷脂综合征的临床研究[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(10): 1162-1167. [Lian RC, Yu SY, Wang XH, et al. Effect of hydroxychloroquine combined with anticoagulant in treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a retrospective clinical study[J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2019, 28(10): 1162-1167.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.10.012.

24.陈力,吴海莲,徐珩. 低分子肝素联合硫酸羟氯喹对妊娠合并APS患者LAC、ACL及β2-GP1水平的影响 [J]. 系统医学, 2022, 7(10): 152-155. [Chen L, Wu HL, Xu H. Effects of low molecular weight heparin combined with hydroxychloroquine sulfate on the levels of LAC, ACL and β2-GP1 in pregnant patients with APS[J]. Journal of Systems Medicine, 2022, 7(10): 152-155.] DOI: 10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2022.10.152.

25.丛建萍,李莹莹. 硫酸羟氯喹联合低分子肝素在妊娠合并抗磷脂综合征中的治疗效果分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2018, 39(1): 44-45. [Cong JP, Li YY. Therapeutic effect of hydroxychloroquine sulfate combined with low molecular weight heparin in pregnancy complicated with antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Journal of Qiqihar Medical College, 2018, 39(1): 44-45.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2018.01.018.

26.杨丽娟. 两种药物分别联用达肝素钠注射液治疗妊娠合并抗磷脂综合征患者的对比研究[J]. 医学新知杂志, 2019, 29(5): 509-510, 513. [Yang LJ. Comparative study of two drugs combined with dalteparin sodium injection in the treatment of pregnant patients with antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Journal of New Medical Knowledge, 2019, 29(5): 509-510, 513.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5511.2019.05.014.

27.赵久良,沈海丽,柴克霞,等. 抗磷脂综合征诊疗规范 [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2022, 61(9): 1000-1007. [Zhao JL, Shen HL, Chai KX, et al. Recommendations for management of antiphospholipid syndrome in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2022, 61(9): 1000-1007.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20211222-00907.

28.Kaneko K, Ozawa N, Murashima A.Obstetric anti-phospholipid syndrome: from pathogenesis to treatment[J]. Immunol Med, 2022, 45(2): 79-93. DOI: 10.1080/25785826.2021.1969116.

29.Erton ZB, Erkan D. Treatment advances in antiphospholipid syndrome: 2022 update[J]. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2022, 65: 102212. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102212.

30.Takaki Y, Daimon A, Nunode M, et al. Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine for improving pregnancy outcomes in a female with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 2022: 5612091. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5612091.

31.Khizroeva, J, Bitsadze, V, Tincani, A, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: rationale and results of an observational study of refractory cases[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25): 6157-6164. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1908992.

32.齐莉,张晓莉,王晓非. 羟氯喹联合低分子肝素及糖皮质激素治疗妊娠合并抗磷脂综合征效果分析[J]. 天津医药, 2014(10): 1023-1025. [Qi L, Zhang XL, Wang XF. Clinical analysis of hydroxychloroquine combined with low-molecular-weight heparin and glucocorticoids in treatment of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Tianjin Medical Journal, 2014(10): 1023-1025.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9896.2014.10.018.

33.Mekinian A, Vicaut E, Cohen J, et al. Hydroxychloroquine to obtain pregnancy without adverse obstetrical events in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: french phase II multicenter randomized trial, HYDROSAPL[J]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, 2018, 46(7-8): 598-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.06.008.

34.Schreiber K, Breen K, Cohen H, et al. HYdroxychloroquine to Improve Pregnancy Outcome in Women with AnTIphospholipid Antibodies (HYPATIA) protocol: a multinational randomized controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine versus placebo in addition to standard treatment in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome or antibodies[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2017, 43(6): 562-571. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603359.

35.Frishman M, Radin M, Schreiber K. Hydroxychloroquine and antiphospholipid antibody-related pregnancy morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 32(5): 351-358. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000649.

36.Lacroix I, Bénévent J, Damase-Michel C. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine during pregnancy: What do we know?[J]. Therapie, 2020, 75(4): 384-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.05.004.

37.田园,徐金凤,陈代娟. 非经典抗磷脂抗体在产科抗磷脂综合征的诊断价值研究进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2022, 38(4): 270-273. [Tian Y, Xu JF, Chen DJ. Research progress on the diagnostic value of non-classical antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 38(4): 270-273.] http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7107204805.

38.Saccone G, Berghella V, Maruotti GM, et al. Antiphospholipid antibody profile based obstetric outcomes of primary antiphospholipid syndrome: the PREGNANTS study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 216(5): 525. e1-525.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.026.

Popular papers
Last 6 months