Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 33,2024 No.2 Detail

Comparison of effectiveness, safety, and economy of generic and original levetiracetam concentrated solution for injection: a real-world study

Published on Feb. 29, 2024Total Views: 969 times Total Downloads: 369 times Download Mobile

Author: FENG Yingnan 1 DONG Xianzhe 1 PENG Jing 2 WANG Ke 1 WANG Zhizhou 1 LUAN Jiajie 2 ZHANG Lan 1 YUE Xiaolin 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China 2. Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital), Wuhu 241001, Anhui Province, China

Keywords: Levetiracetam concentrated solution for injection Generic drugs Original drugs Effectiveness Safety Economy Drug centralized procurement Real-world study

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312037

Reference: FENG Yingnan, DONG Xianzhe, PENG Jing, WANG Ke, WANG Zhizhou, LUAN Jiajie, ZHANG Lan, YUE Xiaolin.Comparison of effectiveness, safety, and economy of generic and original levetiracetam concentrated solution for injection: a real-world study[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2024, 33(2):152-157.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312037.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and economy of the clinical application of levetiracetam (LEV) concentrated solution for injection generic drug and the original drug in the national centralized volume-based procurement.

Methods  The information of inpatients using original LEV concentrated solution for injection in the Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University (original drug group) and inpatients using generic LEV concentrated solution for injection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (generic drug group) was retrospectively analyzed after the implementation of the procurement policy (from November 2021 to March 2022). To compare the effectiveness, safety and economy of the two in the prevention and treatment of epilepsy.

Results  In the original drug group and the generic drug group, 18 and 17 patients were enrolled in the treatment of epilepsy respectively, the effective rates were 50.00% and 58.82%, the incidence of adverse reactions were both 0%, and the median daily cost was 255.00 (255.00, 510.00) yuan and 131.78 (131.78, 131.78) yuan. After propensity score matching, both the original drug group and the generic drug group had 76 patients each received preventive medication, the effective rates were 97.37% and 100% (P>0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions were both 0%. The median daily fee for the original the generic drug group was 170.00 (170.00, 170.00) yuan and 131.78 (131.78, 131.78) yuan, there were significant difference (P<0.01).

Conclusion  The clinical effect of generic and original LEV concentrated solution for injection in preventing epilepsy is basically the same, the clinical safety are equivalent, the generic has better economy than the original. The effective rate of the treatment of epilepsy is similar, while the sample size needs to be further expanded to verify the results.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Beghi E. The epidemiology of epilep sy[J]. Neuroepidemiology, 2020, 54(2): 185-191. DOI: 10.1159/ 000503831.

2.Thijs RD, Surges R, O'Brien TJ, et al. Epilepsy in adults[J].Lancet, 2019, 393(10172): 689-701. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32596-0.

3.陈玉秀, 赵玉华. 抗癫痫药物左乙拉西坦治疗癫痫的研究进展[J]. 癫痫与神经电生理学杂志, 2023, 32(1): 42-45. [Chen YX, Zhao YH. Research progress in the treatment of epilepsy with the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam[J]. Journal of Epileptology and Electroneurophysiology (CHINA), 2023, 32(1): 42-45.] DOI: 10.19984/j.cnki.1674-8972.2023.01.08.

4.北京药理学会, 中国药师协会, 中国老年保健医学研究会合理用药与综合评价分会, 等. 北京市医疗机构落实国家组织药品集中采购专家共识[J]. 中国医药, 2022, 17(11): 1601-1604. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673- 4777.2022.11.001.

5.岳小林, 付娜, 赵艳玲, 等. 国家集中带量采购中选药品疗效与安全性的真实世界研究[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2022, 20(6): 43-48. [Yue XL, Fu N, Zhao YL, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of selected drugs in the national volume-based procurement: a real-world study[J]. Clin Med J, 2022, 20(6): 43-48.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1672-3384.2022.06.008.

6.中国抗癫痫协会, 主编. 临床诊疗指南—癫痫病分册,  第2版[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 1-140.

7.中国抗癫痫协会专家组. 颅脑疾病手术后抗癫痫药物应用的专家共识(试行)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(7): 751-754. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346. 2012.07.034.

8.梁明娟, 邱炜凤, 张静雯, 等. 左乙拉西坦的国产仿制药替换治疗儿童癫痫的疗效及安全性研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2022, 24(3): 285-289. [Liang MJ, Qiu WF, Zhang JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from brand-name to domestic generic levetiracetam in children with epilepsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 2022, 24(3): 285-289.] DOI: 10.7499j.issn. 1008-8830.2111033.

9.杨黎, 董宪喆, 齐晓涟, 等. 左乙拉西坦在临床应用中疗效与安全性的研究进展[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2021, 30(7): 607-610. [Yang L, Dong XZ, Qi XL, et al. Research progress on efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in clinical application[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2021, 30(7): 607-610.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2021.07.006.

10.Trinka E, Kälviäinen R. 25 years of advances in the definition, classification and treatment of status epilepticus[J]. Seizure, 2017, 44: 65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j. seizure.2016.11.001.

11.Chaari A, Mohamed AS, Abdelhakim K, et al. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in brain injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J ClinPharm, 2017, 39(5): 998-1003. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0507-6.

12.Zhao L, Wu YP, Qi JL, et al. Efficacy of levetiracetam compared with phenytoin in prevention of seizures in brain injured patients: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(48): e13247. DOI: 10.1097/MD. 0000000000013247.

13.李蕊, 申红霞, 徐鲁杰, 等. 左乙拉西坦治疗儿童癫痫安全性的Meta分析[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2022, 28(9): 21-25. [Li R, Shen HX, Xu LJ, et al. Meta-analysis on safety of levetiracetam in the treatment of epilepsy in children[J]. Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy, 2022, 28(9): 21-25.] DOI: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2022.09. 006.

14.Howard P, Remi J, Remi C, et al. Levetiracetam[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2018, 56(4): 645-649. DOI: 10.1016/j. jpainsymman.2018.07.012.

15.Elek P, Harsányi A, Zelei T, et al. Policy objective of generic medicines from the investment perspective: the case of clopidogrel[J]. Health Policy, 2017, 121(5): 558-565. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.02.015.

16.中国医师协会神经内科分会癫痫专委会. 成人全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态治疗中国专家共识[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2018, 45(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.2018.01.001.

17.中华医学会神经病学分会脑电图与癫痫学组. 非惊厥性癫痫持续状态的治疗专家共识[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2013, 46(2): 133-137. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006- 7876.2013.02.017.

18.中国抗癫痫协会药物治疗专业委员会. 终止癫痫持续状态发作的专家共识[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2022, 47(7): 639-646. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2022.07.0639.

19.中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑电图与癫痫学组. 中国成人局灶性癫痫规范化诊治指南[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(12): 1341-1352.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20220411-00289.

Popular papers
Last 6 months