Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 33,2024 No.1 Detail

Cost-utility analysis of edaravone dexborneol for acute ischemic stroke

Published on Feb. 01, 2024Total Views: 392 times Total Downloads: 1331 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHOU Shasha CHEN Xiangfan CHEN Xia

Affiliation: Department of Pharmacy, Nantong First People’s Hospital, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China

Keywords: Edaravone dexborneol Edaravone Acute ischemic stroke Decision tree model Cost-utility analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202305025

Reference: ZHOU Shasha, CHEN Xiangfan, CHEN Xia.Cost-utility analysis of edaravone dexborneol for acute ischemic stroke[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2024, 33(1):68-74.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202305025.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone alone combined with conventional therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods  From the perspective of the healthcare systems, a decision tree model was constructed using the data from the randomized double-blind comparative trial of edaravone dexborneol in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (TASTE trial). Cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the health benefits of edaravone dexborneol at 1 month and 5 years. The robustness of the results was tested by single factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis.

Results  For AIS patients, the 1-month incremental cost-utility ratio was 53 212.89 yuan /quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and the 5-year incremental cost-utility ratio was 49 631.25 yuan /QALY, both of which were smaller than China's per capita GDP in 2022 (85 698 yuan). Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the change of NIHSS score in 2 groups of improved patients, the probability of improvement in 2 groups and the probability of deterioration in edaravone group were the most influential factors on the outcome of incremental cost effectiveness. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that edaravone dexcborneol was more economical when WTP was 1 times China's per capita GDP in 2022.

Conclusion  Edaravon dexborneol is a more effective and economical treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients than edaravone alone.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.中国脑卒中防治报告编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2020, 17(5): 272-281. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2020.05.008.

2.中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.

3.Kobayashi S, Fukuma S, Ikenoue T, et al. Effect of edaravone on neurological symptoms in real-world patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(7): 1805-1811. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024351.

4.Liu R, Zhang L, Lan X, et al. Protection by borneol on cortical neurons against oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion: involvement of anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation through nuclear transcription factor κappaB signaling pathway[J]. Neuroscience, 2011, 176: 408-419. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.029.

5.Xu J, Wang Y, Wang A, et al. Safety and efficacy of compound edaravone versus edaravone for patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a phase Ⅱ, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, multiple-dose, active-controlled clinical trial[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2019, 4(3): 109-114. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000221.

6.Xu J, Wang A, Meng X, et al. Edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone alone for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a phase Ⅲ, randomized, double-blind, comparative trial[J]. Stroke, 2021, 52(3): 772-780. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031197.

7.Shi F, He Z, Wang L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus edaravone for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in China: based on the TASTE study[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13:938239. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.938239.

8.Pan Y, Zhang L, Li Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention for acute ischemic stroke in China[J]. Stroke, 2020, 51(4): 1265-1271. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027980.

9.赵昕锐, 田磊. 丁苯酞注射液对比注射用尤瑞克林治疗中度急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效用分析[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2022, 31(6): 602-608. [Zhao XR, Tian L. Cost effectiveness analysis of butylphthalide and sodium chloride injection versus human urinary kallindinogenase for the treatment of moderate acute ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2022, 31(6): 602-608.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2022.06.013.

10.药智网. 药智数据-药品中标信息查询[DB/OL]. (2021-08-10) [2021-06-03]. https://db.yaozh.com/yaopinzhongbiao.

11.国家卫生健康委员会, 编著. 中国卫生健康统计年鉴2020[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2020: 1-347.

12.Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray AM, Bull L, et al. Quality of life after TIA and stroke: ten-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study[J]. Neurology, 2013, 81(18): 1588-1595.DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a9f45f.

13.管欣, 张瑶, 李洪超. 注射用尤瑞克林与丁苯酞氯化钠注射液治疗轻-中度急性缺血性脑卒中的成本效用分析[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2020, 29(6): 715-720. [Guan X, Zhang Y, Li HC. Cost-utility analysis of human urinary kallindinogenase versus 3-N-butylphthalide for patients with mild or moderate acute ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 2020, 29(6): 715-720.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2020.06.019.

14.刘国恩, 主编. 中国药物经济学评价指南2020[M]. 中国市场出版社, 2020: 41-47.

15.国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. (2023-02-28) [2023-05-01]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2023-02/28/content_5743623.htm.

16.万小敏, 谭重庆, 曾小慧, 等. 药物经济学评价概率敏感度分析中关联参数的参数分布[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2018, 37(3): 177-179. [Wan XM, Tan CQ, Zeng XH, et al. Distribution of correlating parameters in probabilistic sensitivity analysis of pharmacoeconomics[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2018, 37(3): 177-179.] DOI: 10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2018.03.013.

17.刘瑞哲, 邱凯锋, 江燕清, 等. 阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗与索拉非尼一线治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的药物经济学评价[J].中国药师, 2022, 25(5): 825-831. [Liu RZ, Qiu KF, Jiang YQ, et al. Economic evaluation of atezolizunab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. China Pharmacist, 2022, 25(5): 825-831.DOI: 10.19962/j.cnki.issn1008-049X.2022.05.013.

18.Martin RH, Yeatts SD, Hill MD, et al. ALIAS (albumin in acute ischemic stroke) trials: analysis of the combined data from parts 1 and 2[J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(9): 2355-2359. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012825.

19.Elkins J, Veltkamp R, Montaner J, et al. Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (ACTION): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(3): 217-226. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30357-X.

20.Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, et al. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10227): 878-887. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30258-0.

21.Lapchak PA. A critical assessment of edaravone acute ischemic stroke efficacy trials: is edaravone an effective neuroprotective therapy?[J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2010, 11(10): 1753-1763. DOI: 10.1517/14656566. 2010.493558.

22.Xu L, Gao Y, Hu M, et al. Edaravone dexborneol protects cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury through activating Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in mice[J]. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 36(5): 790-800. DOI: 10.1111/fcp. 12782.

Popular papers
Last 6 months