Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 33,2024 No.1 Detail

Teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis: a rapid health technology assessment

Published on Jan. 15, 2024Total Views: 865 times Total Downloads: 510 times Download Mobile

Author: LYU Peng 1 ZHANG Jingli 1 WAN Yuansheng 2 HUANG Yifei 2 YOU Ruxu 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Taihe Country People’s Hospital/ Taihe Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Taihe 236600, Anhui Province, China 2. Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China

Keywords: Teriparatide Osteogenesis Safety Effectiveness Economy Rapid health technology assessment

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312071

Reference: LYU Peng, ZHANG Jingli, WAN Yuansheng, HUANG Yifei, YOU Ruxu.Teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis: a rapid health technology assessment[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2024, 33(1):75-84.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202312071.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the efficacy, safety and economy of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Methods  PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP databases and websites related to health technology evaluation were systematically searched to collect high-quality clinical evidence and economic evaluation literature of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis from the inception to January 20, 2023. Two researchers independently identified studies, extracted data, assessed the quality of included studies, and descriptive analyzed and summarised the results.

Results  A total of 25 literatures were included, involving 3 HTA reports, 15 systematic review/Meta-analyses and 7 economic studies were included. In terms of effectiveness, the evaluation results showed that teriparatide could improve bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis, reduce the incidence of vertebral/non-vertebral fractures in primary and secondary osteoporosis and prevent the fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis compared to bisphosphonates and placebos. In terms of safety, teriparatide was proven to be safe with no elevated risk of adverse drug reactions. In terms of economic cost, teriparatide has a higher cost and economic disadvantage compared with bisphosphonates, however, for people with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis and high risk of fracture, teriparatide can be considered as a potential cost-effect treatment option.

Conclusion  Teriparatide is effective and safe in the treatment of osteoporosis, but it is not cost-effective advantages compared with the existing other anti-osteoporosis medications.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.陈骏, 赵立波, 万元胜, 等. 阿仑膦酸钠用于骨质疏松症治疗的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2021, 41(21): 2227-2235. [Chen J, Zhao LB, Wan YS, et al. Rapid health technology assessment of treating osteoporosis with alendronate[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2021, 41(21): 2227-2235.] DOI: 10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.21.14.

2.马远征, 王以朋, 刘强, 等. 中国老年骨质疏松诊疗指南(2018)[J].中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(11): 2557-2575. [Ma YZ, Wang YM, Liu Q, et al. 2018 China guideline for diagnosis and treatment of senile osteoporosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2019, 39(11): 2557-2575.] DOI: 10.19538/j.nk2019010109.

3.Binder EF, Brown M, Sinacore DR, et al. Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA, 2004, 292(7): 837-846. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.7.837.

4.Gregson CL, Armstrong DJ, Bowden J, et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2017, 12(1): 43. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5.

5.Martin TJ, Quinn JM, Gillespie MT, et al. Mechanisms involved in skeletal anabolic therapies[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006, 1068: 458-470. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1346.043.

6.陈静, 成华, 李亚利, 等. 罗沙司他治疗肾性贫血的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 中国医院用药评价与析, 2022, 22(10): 1224-1227. [Chen J, Cheng H, Li YL, et al. Rapid health technology assessment of roxadustat in the treatment of renal anemia[J]. Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals, 2022, 22(10): 1224-1227.] DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2022.10.016.

7.沈姗, 杨洁, 刘云霞, 等. 安罗替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 医学新知, 2021, 31(5): 350-356. [Shen S, Yang J, Liu YX, et al. Rapid health technology assessment of anlotinib in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. New Medicine, 2021, 31(5): 350-356.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202102017.

8.韩宝峰, 朱志军, 沈素, 等. 肝移植受者免疫抑制药应用的药物经济学研究系统评价[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2021, 30(4): 260-265. [Han BF, Zhu ZJ, Shen S, et al. Inmunosupressant usage in liver transplatation recipients: a systematic review op pharmacoeconomic studies[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2021, 30(4): 260-265.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2021.04.009.

9.Stevenson M, Jones ML, De Nigris E, et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2005, 9(22): 1-160. DOI: 10.3310/hta9220.

10.Crandall CJ , Newberry SJ , Diamant A, et al. Treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of a 2007 report[R]. U. S.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2012: 1-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22553885/.

11.Davis S, Simpson E, Hamilton J, et al. Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2020, 24(29): 1-314. DOI: 10.3310/hta24290.

12.哈娜, 张新建, 海鑫. 抗骨质疏松药物预防原发性骨质疏松症患者骨折发生风险--基于贝叶斯框架的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2022, 17(5): 84-98. [Ha N, Zhang XJ, Hai X. Anti-osteoporosis drugs prevent fracture risk in patients with primary osteoporosis: network meta-analysis based on bayesian framework[J]. China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 2022, 17(5): 84-98.] DOI: 10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2022.05.016.

13.胡翼安, 洪浩威, 潘杰, 等. 抗骨质疏松药物治疗糖皮质激素诱导型骨质疏松症的网状Meta分析[J]. 中国处方药, 2022, 20(3): 76-80. [Hu YA, Hong HW, Pan J, et al.Reticular meta analysis of anti osteoporosis drugs in the treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis[J]. Journal of China Prescription Drug, 2022, 20(3): 76-80.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-945X.2022.03.030.

14.吕秋菊, 蒲强红. 特立帕肽与双膦酸盐治疗糖皮质激素性骨质疏松有效性与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 临床医药实践, 2022, 31(3): 166-169. [Lyu QJ, Pu QH. Compartive efficacy and safety of teriparate and biosphosphonates for treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis[J]. Proceeding of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 31(3): 166-169.] DOI: 10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2022. 03.006.

15.Ouyang Y, Chen S, Wan T, et al. The effects of teriparatide and bisphosphonates on new fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(7): e24839. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024839.

16.Fan G, Zhao Q, Lu P, et al. Comparison between teriparatide and bisphosphonates for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(15): e18964. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018964.

17.Simpson EL, Martyn-St James M, Hamilton J, et al. Clinical effectiveness of denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab, and teriparatide for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Bone, 2020, 130: 115081. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115081.

18.Yuan F, Peng W, Yang C. Teriparatide versus bisphosphonates for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 66: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.004.

19.Wang YK, Qin SQ, Ma T, et al. Effects of teriparatide versus alendronate for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(21): e6970. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006970.

20.Kim SM, Kang KC, Kim JW, et al. Current role and application of teriparatide in fracture healing of osteoporotic patients: a systematic review[J]. J Bone Metab, 2017, 24(1): 65-73. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.1.65.

21.Lou S, Lv H, Wang G, et al. The effect of teriparatide on fracture healing of osteoporotic patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 2016: 6040379. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6040379.

22.崔凯, 马爱霞. 特立帕肽与降钙素治疗绝经后骨质疏松症疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国药物评价, 2016, 33(2): 101-105. [Cui K, Ma AX. Meta analysis on efficacy and safety of teriparatide and calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation, 2016, 33(2): 101-105.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:YAPJ.0.2016-02-009.

23.Chen JF, Yang KH, Zhang ZL, et al. A systematic review on the use of daily subcutaneous administration of teriparatide for treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture in Asia[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2015, 26(1): 11-28. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2838-7.

24.Han SL, Wan SL. Effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density and fracture in postmenopausal osteoporosis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2012, 66(2): 199-209. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02837.x.

25.Nakamura T, Tsujimoto M, Hamaya E, et al. Consistency of fracture risk reduction in Japanese and Caucasian osteoporosis patients treated with teriparatide: a meta-analysis[J]. J Bone Miner Metab, 2012, 30(3): 321-325. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-011-0313-5.

26.李丹, 陈兴明, 乔凤娟, 等. 特立帕肽与阿仑膦酸盐对比治疗骨质疏松症有效性及安全性的Meta分析 [J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2011, 17(11): 997-1001. [Li D, Chen XM, Qiao FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety comparison of teriparatide and alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis, 2011, 17(11): 997-1001.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2011.11.015.

27.You R, Mori T, Ke L, et al. Which injected antiosteoporotic medication is worth paying for? A cost-effectiveness analysis of teriparatide, zoledronate, ibandronate, and denosumab for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China[J]. Menopause, 2021, 29(2): 210-218. DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001911.

28.Hagino H, Tanaka K, Silverman S, et al. Cost effectiveness of romosozumab versus teriparatide for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis in Japan[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2021, 32(10): 2011-2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05927-1.

29.Taheri S, Mirzayeh Fashami F, Peiravian F, et al. Teriparatide in the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis: a cost-utility analysis[J]. Iran J Pharm Res, 2019, 18(2): 1073-1085. DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2019. 1100679.

30.Le QA, Hay JW, Becker R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential treatment of abaloparatide followed by alendronate versus teriparatide followed by alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the United States[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2019, 53(2): 134-143. DOI: 10.1177/1060028018798034.

31.Mori T, Crandall CJ, Ganz DA. Cost-effectiveness of sequential teriparatide/alendronate versus alendronate-alone strategies in high-risk osteoporotic women in the US: analyzing the impact of generic/biosimilar teriparatide[J]. JBMR Plus, 2019, 3(11): e10233. DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10233.

32.Ebadi Fard Azar AA, Rezapour A, Alipour V, et al. Cost-effectiveness of teriparatide compared with alendronate and risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients in Iran[J]. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 2017, 31: 39. DOI: 10.14196/mjiri.31.39.

33.Borgström F, Ström O, Marin F, et al. Cost effectiveness of teriparatide and PTH (1-84) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. J Med Econ, 2010, 13(3): 381-392. DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2010.499072.

Popular papers
Last 6 months