Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 32,2023 No.12 Detail

Quantitative analysis of polymyxin B in human serum by LC-MS/MS

Published on Dec. 30, 2023Total Views: 1258 times Total Downloads: 569 times Download Mobile

Author: Liu ZHANG Liang LIU Jian-Hua WU Dong-Fang WU

Affiliation: Department of Pharmacy, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China

Keywords: Polymyxin B LC-MS/MS Blood drug concentration

DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202312008

Reference: Liu ZHANG, Liang LIU, Jian-Hua WU, Dong-Fang WU.Quantitative analysis of polymyxin B in human serum by LC-MS/MS[J].Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi,2023, 32(12):1259-1266.DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202312008.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To develop a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for the determination of polymyxin B in human serum.

Methods  Polymyxin E2 was used as an internal standard and acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) was used for protein precipitation. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Hypersil GOLDTM C18 column. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B was methanol. The flow rate was 0.4 mL·min-1, with gradient elution. The column temperature was 40℃. The injection volume was 2 μL and the analysis time was 3.3 min. Multiple reaction monitoring and electrospray ion source positive ion mode were applied for quantitative analysis. The quantitative analysis ion pairs were m/z 402.10>101.10 (polymyxin B1), m/z 397.45>101.10 (polymyxin B2), m/z 578.50>101.10 (polymyxin E2).

Results  The linear relationship of polymyxin B1 was at 22-15 000 ng·mL-1 and B2 was at 5-1 700 ng·mL-1 in human serum, which achieved excellent linearity, and the correlation coefficient was higher than 0.999 0. The lower limit of quantification of polymyxin B1 and B2 were 22 ng·mL-1 and 5 ng·mL-1, respectively. The accuracies were 95.98%-104.60% for polymyxin B1, 98.11%-105.59% for polymyxin B2, respectively. The RSDs of intra- and inter-day precision were less than 15%. The recoveries of polymyxin B1 and B2 were 97.26%-103.31% and 95.81%-101.22%, respectively, and the matrix effects were 96.52%-109.54% and 93.29%-109.95%, respectively. The RSDs of the samples were all less than 15%. The mean AUC0- 24h was (72.85±17.87) mg·h·L-1 in six patients.

Conclusion  The established LC-MS/MS method for determining polymyxin B in human serum meets the requirements of biological sample analysis. It is suitable for determining polymyxin B in human serum.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Chen N, Guo J, Xie J, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B: a systematic review[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(4): 231. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-236.

2.Tsuji BT, Pogue JM, Zavascki AP, et al. International consensus guidelines for the optimal use of the polymyxins: endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society for Anti-infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP)[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2019, 39(1): 10-39. DOI: 10.1002/phar.2209.

3.Han L, Xu FM, Zhang XS, et al. Trough polymyxin B plasma concentration is an independent risk factor for its nephrotoxicity[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 88(3): 1202-1210. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15061.

4.Auletta S, Galli F, Varani M, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of (99m)tc-polymyxin B for specific targeting of gram-bacteria[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(2): 232. DOI: 10.3390/biom11020232.

5.Zhang B, Li X, Chen Y, et al. Determination of polymyxin B in human plasma and epithelial lining fluid using LC-MS/MS and its clinical application in therapeutic drug monitoring[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2023, 227: 115291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115291.

6.Liang D, Liang Z, Deng G, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing optimization of polymyxin B in critically ill patients[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 14: 1122310. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1122310.

7.Huang X, Liu X, Wang Y, et al. Determination of polymyxin B in dried blood spots using LC-MS/MS for therapeutic drug monitoring[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2022, 1192: 123131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123131.

8.Xia GL, Jiang RL. Efficacy and safety of polymyxin B in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms infections[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 1034. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06719-y.

9.Avedissian SN, Liu J, Rhodes NJ, et al. A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B[J]. Antibiotics (Basel), 2019, 8(1): 31. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8010031.

10.Liu X, Huang C, Bergen PJ, et al. Chinese consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of polymyxin B, endorsed by the Infection and Chemotherapy Committee of the Shanghai Medical Association and the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Committee of the Chinese Pharmacological Society[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2023, 24(2): 130-142. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2200466.

11.Wang P, Zhang Q, Qin Z, et al. A simple and robust liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analytical method for therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid polymyxin B1 and B2[J]. Ther Drug Monit, 2020, 42(5): 716-723. DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000754.

12.Bladek T, Szymanek-Bany I, Posyniak A. Determination of polypeptide antibiotic residues in food of animal origin by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(14): 3261. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25143261.

13.Yuan Y, Xu QM, Yu SC, et al. Control of the polymyxin analog ratio by domain swapping in the nonribosomal peptide synthetase of Paenibacillus polymyxa[J]. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 47(6-7): 551-562. DOI: 10.1007/s10295-020-02275-7.

14.Chen DJ, Cui AL, Chen JR, et al. The low-alkalinity polymyxin derivative, AL-6, shows high activity against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in vitro and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 in vivo: Preliminary analysis of the antibacterial mechanism[J]. Microb Drug Resist, 2021, 27(7): 933-941. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0474.

15.Liu X, Yu Z, Wang Y, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of polymyxin B by LC-MS/MS in plasma and urine[J]. Bioanalysis, 2020, 12(12): 845-855. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0051.

16.郑香宜, 吴建华, 张柳, 等. HPLC-MS/MS法测定人血清中达托霉素的方法研究及临床应用 [J]. 中国药师, 2022, 25(12): 2259-2264. [Zheng XY, Wu JH, Zhang L, et al. Validation of HPLC-MS /MS for the determination of daptomycin in human serum and Its clinical application[J].China Pharmacist, 2022, 25(12): 2259-2264.] DOI: 10.19962/j.cnki.issn1008-049X.2022.12.036.

17.Matar KM, Al-Refai B. Quantification of colistin in plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to a pharmacokinetic study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 8198. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65041-w.

18.Mead A, Gillard N, Robert C, et al. Determination of colistin in luminal and parietal intestinal matrices of chicken by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 2021, 44(6): 982-985. DOI: 10.1111/jvp.13022.

19.刘亮, 张觅, 刘雅楠, 等. 多粘菌素B血药浓度监测研究进展 [J]. 中国药师, 2021, 24(3): 536-541. [Liu L, Zhang M, Liu YN, et al. Review of therapeutic drug monitoring of polymyxin B[J]. China Pharmacist, 2021, 24(3): 536-541.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2021. 03.027.

20.Falagas ME, Kyriakidou M, Voulgaris GL, et al. Clinical use of intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections: an evaluation of the current evidence[J]. J Glob Antimicrob Resist, 2021, 24: 342-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.12.026.

21.Manchandani P, Thamlikitkul V, Dubrovskaya Y, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B[J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2018, 104(3): 534-538. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.981.

22.Xie YL, Jin X, Yan SS, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous colistin sulfate and dosage optimization in critically ill patients[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 967412. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.967412.

23.Heavner MS, Claeys KC, Masich AM, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations of antibiotics of last resort in treating gram-negative infections in adult critically ill patients[J]. Curr Infect Dis Rep, 2018, 20(5): 10. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-018-0614-0.

24.Li L, Li X, Xia Y, et al. Recommendation of antimicrobial dosing optimization during continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2020, 11: 786. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00786.

Popular papers
Last 6 months