Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 34,2025 No.11 Detail

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Published on Nov. 28, 2025Total Views: 126 times Total Downloads: 31 times Download Mobile

Author: LU Ronghua LIU Jiaojiao PANG Tengfei CAI Rui YUAN Jian

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology, Nantong Haimen People's Hospital, Nantong 226100, Jiangsu Province, China

Keywords: Tegoprazan Gastroesophageal reflux disease Meta-analysis Systematic review Randomized controlled trial

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202502020

Reference: LU Ronghua, LIU Jiaojiao, PANG Tengfei, CAI Rui, YUAN Jian. Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2025, 34(11): 1294-1301. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202502020.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To systematically review the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods  PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on tegoprazan for GERD treatment from inception to January 1, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 16 software.

Results  A total of 7 RCTs were included, involving 1,329 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the overall effective rate between the tegoprazan group and the control group (placebo or proton pump inhibitors) [RR=1.08, 95%CI (0.99, 1.17), P=0.07]. There was also no statistically significant difference in the cure rate between the tegoprazan group and the control group (proton pump inhibitors) [RR=0.99, 95%CI (0.96, 1.02), P=0.53]. Comparing the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and serious adverse events (SAE) during treatment between the tegoprazan group and the control group, no statistically significant differences were found [TEAE: RR=0.90, 95%CI (0.62, 1.32), P=0.60; SAE: RR=0.61, 95%CI (0.26, 1.48), P=0.28]. In terms of specific adverse event, the incidence of abnormal liver function was significantly higher in the tegoprazan group compared to the control group [RR=7.60, 95%CI (1.40, 42.27), P=0.02], while the incidence of other adverse reactions showed no significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusion  Tegoprazan has relatively good overall efficacy and safety in the treatment of GERD, and its efficacy is similar to that of proton pump inhibitors, which can be used as an alternative treatment for proton pump inhibitors. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.冯才举, 汤世琳,徐志洪,等. 非糜烂性胃食管反流病与消化道菌群相关性研究进展[J]. 华西医学, 2023, 38(10): 1595-1600. [Feng CJ, Tang SL, Xu ZH, et al. Research progress on the relationship between non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastrointestinal flora[J]. West China Medical Journal, 2023, 38(10): 1595-1600.] DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.202306190.

2.Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the los angeles classification[J]. Gut, 1999, 45(2): 172-180. DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.2.172.

3.Nirwan JS, Hasan SS, Babar ZU, et al. Global prevalence and risk factors of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD): systematic review with Meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 5814. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62795-1.

4.中国医疗保健国际交流促进会胃食管反流多学科分会. 中国胃食管反流病多学科诊疗共识[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2020, 7(1): 1-28. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-8765. 2020.01.001.

5.中华医学会消化病学分会. 2020年中国胃食管反流病专家共识[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2020, 40(10): 649-663. [Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus of gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion, 2020, 40(10): 649-663.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn311367-20200918-00558.

6.唐嘉曦, 国梦然, 樊天斐, 等. 伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国药房, 2023, 34(6): 735-739, 745. [Tang JX, Guo MR, Fan TF, et al. Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a Meta-analysis[J]. China Pharmacy, 2023, 34(6): 735-739, 745.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.06.18.

7.吴婧, 沈丽霞, 谷晓策, 等. CYP2C19基因多态性指导质子泵抑制剂精准用药研究进展[J]. 中国药业, 2022, 31(18): 129-133. [Wu J, Shen LX, Gu XC, et al. Research progress of CYP2C19 gene polymorphism guiding the individualized use of proton pump inhibitors[J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 31(18): 129-133.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2022.18.033.

8.王威, 柯义君, 程畅, 等. 伏诺拉生治疗内镜下黏膜剥离术后相关溃疡的快速卫生技术评估[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(3): 306-313. [Wang W, Ke YJ, Cheng C, et al. Vonoprazan for ulcers associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection: a rapid health technology assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(3): 306-313.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202410121.

9.Gu C, Olszewski T, King KL, et al. The effects of modifying amount and type of dietary carbohydrate on esophageal acid exposure time and esophageal reflux symptoms: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2022, 117(10): 1655-1667. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001889.

10.Kawami N, Hoshino S, Hoshikawa Y, et al. Pathogenesis of potassium-competitive acid blocker-resistant non-erosive reflux disease[J]. Digestion, 2018, 98(3): 194-200. DOI: 10.1159/ 000488530.

11.He JJ, Cao GY, Yu JC, et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single ascending and multiple oral doses of tegoprazan in healthy Chinese subjects[J]. Clin Drug Investig, 2021, 41(1): 89-97. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-020-00986-4.

12.Kim SH, Cho KB, Chun HJ, et al. Randomised clinical trial: comparison of tegoprazan and placebo in non-erosive reflux disease[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2021, 54(4): 402-411. DOI: 10.1111/apt.16477.

13.Chapelle N, Ben Ghezala I, Barkun A. The pharmacotherapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2021, 22(2): 219-227. DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817385.

14.GBD 2017 Oesophageal Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(6): 582-597. DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30007-8.

15.Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2019, 366: l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

16.Shin CM, Choi SC, Cho JW, et al. Comparison of tegoprazan and lansoprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis up to 4 weeks: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator phase 4 trial[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2025, 37(1): e14969. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14969.

17.肖文秀, 温艳, 周围, 等. 新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂替戈拉生与奥美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的临床疗效比较[J]. 临床医药实践, 2024, 33(10): 745-748. DOI: 10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2024.10.022.

18.Zhu H, Xue Q, Song Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan (LXI-15028) vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority phase Ⅲ trial[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2024, 138(19): 2464-2471. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003276.

19.Kim JS, Seo SI, Kang SH, et al. Effects of tegoprazan versus esomeprazole on nighttime heartburn and sleep quality in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2023, 29(1): 58-64. DOI: 10.5056/jnm22104.

20.Cho YK, Kim JH, Kim HS, et al. Randomised clinical trial: comparison of tegoprazan and lansoprazole as maintenance therapy for healed mild erosive oesophagitis[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2023, 57(1): 72-80. DOI: 10.1111/apt.17255.

21.Lee KJ, Son BK, Kim GH, et al. Randomised phase 3 trial: tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs. esomeprazole in patients with erosive oesophagitis[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 49(7): 864-872. DOI: 10.1111/apt.15185.

22.杨君, 刘芳, 臧雷. 新型钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂: 替戈拉生[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2022, 41(5): 272-275. [Yang J, Liu F, Zang L. A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker: tegoprazan[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2022, 41(5): 272-275.] DOI: 10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2022.05.04.

23.Yang E, Kim S, Kim B, et al. Night-time gastric acid suppression by tegoprazan compared to vonoprazan or esomeprazole[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 88(7): 3288-3296. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15268.

24.李勉力, 张伟健, 郭玲珑, 等. 沃诺拉赞对比质子泵抑制剂治疗反流性食管炎有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(6): 712-717. [Li ML, Zhang WJ, Guo LL, et al. Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan versus ppis in treating reflux esophagitis: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(6): 712-717.] DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2020.00.621.

25.Poelmans J, TackL J, Feenstra L. Chronic middle ear disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a causal relation?[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2001, 22(4): 447-450. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200107000-00005.

26.Oshima T, Miwa H. Potent potassium-competitive acid blockers: a new era for the treatment of acid-related diseases[J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2018, 24(3): 334-344. DOI: 10.5056/jnm18029.

Popular papers
Last 6 months