Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 34,2025 No.2 Detail

Signal mining and analysis of adverse events for lecanemab based on the FAERS database

Published on Feb. 28, 2025Total Views: 505 times Total Downloads: 50 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHANG Wen 1 LI Min 1 LIU Erping 1 TAO Wenting 1 CAI Rui 1 ZHOU Weixian 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu Province, China 2. Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu Province, China

Keywords: Lecanemab FAERS database Drug adverse events Signal mining

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202411039

Reference: ZHANG Wen, LI Min, LIU Erping, TAO Wenting, CAI Rui, ZHOU Weixian. Signal mining and analysis of adverse events for lecanemab based on the FAERS database[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2025, 34(2): 166-174. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202411039.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To mine the risk signals of adverse drug events (ADEs) related to lecanemab through the U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, to provide a reference for the safe clinical use of lecanemab.

Methods  Data on adverse events related to lecanemab from the fourth quarter, 2010 to the second quarter 2024 in the FAERS were collected. Potential ADE signals were mined using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) method. The top 30 ADEs in terms of report frequency and signal strength, as well as ADEs categorized by system organ class (SOC), were statistically analyzed.

Results   A total of 868 adverse event reports related to lecanemab were collected, involving 1,986 instances of ADEs with 38 related ADE identified, the proportion of serious ADEs was 23.39%, and 87.15% of ADEs occurred in the first 3 months after the initiation of the drug. The top 30 PT signals in reported cases were headache, chills, fatigue, effusion type amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA-E), hemorrhage-type amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA-H), and so on. The top 30 signals in terms of signal intensity mainly included ARIA-E, ARIA-H, brain fog, infusion-related reactions. ADEs related to nervous system diseases were the most common. Fifteen new suspected or serious ADEs not recorded in the instructions were discovered, such as brain fog, formication, status epilepticus.

Conclusion  Risk assessment of patients' medication should be conducted before clinical use of lecanemab, especially in the first 3 months of the medication period, focus should be placed on monitoring common ADEs, such as ARIA-E, ARIA-H, infusion-related reactions. Attention also needs to be paid to the newly discovered suspected ADEs, to ensure the patients' medication safety.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.王刚, 齐金蕾, 刘馨雅, 等. 中国阿尔茨海默病报告2024[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2024, 23(3): 219-256. [Wang G, Qi JL, Liu XY, et al. China Alzheimer report 2024[J]. Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice, 2024, 23(3): 219-256.] DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2024.03.001.

2.Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(1): 9-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948.

3.Söderberg L, Johannesson M, Nygren P, et al. Lecanemab, aducanumab, and gantenerumab-binding profiles to different forms of amyloid-beta might explain efficacy and side effects in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2023, 20(1): 195-206. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01308-6.

4.Zhang J. Commentaries: Lecanemab: pioneering the way as the first approved drug for Alzheimer's disease treatment[J]. Inflamm Res, 2023, 72(9): 1873-1876. DOI: 10.1007/s00011-023-01788-y.

5.Tahami Monfared AA, Ye W, Sardesai A, et al. A path to improved Alzheimer's care: simulating long-term health outcomes of lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease from the CLARITY AD trial[J]. Neurol Ther, 2023, 12(3): 863-881. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00473-w.

6.Knopman DS. Lecanemab reduces brain amyloid-β and delays cognitive worsening[J]. Cell Rep Med, 2023, 4(3), 100982. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100982.

7.Silvestro L, Vita FD, Vogel A, et al. Safety of ramucirumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Europe and North America: a prospective observational registry[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(4_suppl): 341-341. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.341.

8.Zheng Y, Guo X, Chen C, et al. Cardiovascular toxicities of ibrutinib: a pharmacovigilance study based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database[J]. Pharmaceuticals, 2023, 16(1): 98. DOI: 10.3390/ph16010098.

9.靳盼盼, 刘洋, 邱博, 等. 仑卡奈单抗在早期阿尔兹海默病治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2024, 29(2): 207-214. [Jin PP, Liu Y, Qiu B, et al. Research progress in the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease with lecanemab[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2024, 29(2): 207-214.] DOI: 10.12092/j.issn.1009-2501.2024.02.011.

10.Logovinsky V, Satlin A, Lai R, et al. Safety and tolerability of BAN2401-a clinical study in Alzheimer's disease with a protofibril selective Aβ antibody[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2016, 8(1): 14. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2.

11.Tieu C, Breder CD. A critical evaluation of safety signal analysis using algorithmic standardised MedDRA queries[J]. Drug Saf, 2018, 41: 1375-1385. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-018-0706-7.

12.Breder CD. A method for retrieval of adverse event terms in clinical trial databases using standardised MedDRA queries[J]. Pharmaceut Med, 2016, 30: 103-108. DOI: 10.1007/s40290-016-0136-8.

13.Gosho M, Ishii R, Ohigashi T, et al. Multivariate generalized mixed-effects models for screening multiple adverse drug reactions in spontaneous reporting systems[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15: 1312803. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1312803.

14.Hou Y, Ye X, Wu G, et al. A comparison of disproportionality analysis methods in national adverse drug reaction databases of China[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2014, 13(7): 853-857. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.915938.

15.Xia L, Li K, Li Y, et al. Comparison of statistical signal detection methods in adverse events following immunization-China, 2011-2015[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2024, 6(16): 350-356. DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.066.

16.Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, et al. Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2013, 10(7): 796-803. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6048.

17.Guo M, Shu Y, Chen G, et al. A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events for niraparib[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 20601. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23726-4.

18.Qiao Y, Chi Y, Zhang Q, et al. Safety and efficacy of lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2023, 15: 1169499. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1169499.

19.Hoy SM. Lecanemab: first approval[J]. Drugs, 2023, 83(4): 359-365. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01851-2.

20.Martorana A, Bonomi CG, Di Donna MG, et al. Lecanemab's path forward: navigating the future of Alzheimer's treatment in Europe amidst the EMA's rejection[J]. Neurol Ther, 2024: 1-5. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00675-w.

21.Swanson CJ, Zhang Y, Dhadda S, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer's disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2021, 13(1): 80. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00813-8.

22.Cohen S, Van Dyck CH, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab clarity AD: quality-of-life results from a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial in early Alzheimer's disease[J]. J Prev Alzheimers Dis, 2023, 10(4): 771-777. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2023.123.

23.Honig LS, Sabbagh MN, van Dyck CH, et al. Updated safety results from phase 3 lecanemab study in early Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2024, 16(1): 105. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01441-8.

24.Roytman M, Mashriqi F, Al-Tawil K, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities: an update[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2023, 220(4): 562-574. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.22.28461.

25.AlQuzi F, Bowers A, Alexander K, et al. Assessment of symptoms and adverse events related to immunotherapy in patients with cancer: an integrative review[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2023, 66(1): e69-e84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.316.

26.Carvalho da Silva SP, Jesus M, Roque F, et al. Active pharmacovigilance study: a follow-up model of oral anti-cancer drugs under additional monitoring[J]. Curr Oncol, 2023, 30(4): 4139-4152. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040315.

27.Liu R, Liu C, Feng D, et al. Pharmacovigilance of esketamine nasal spray: an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15: 1414703. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1414703.

28.Rosenberg R, Thorpy MJ, Doghramji K, et al. Brain fog in central disorders of hypersomnolence: a review[J]. J Clin Sleep Med, 2024, 20(4): 643-651. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.11014.

29.Jin L, Gu J, Wu Y, et al. Safety assessment of asenapine in the FAERS database: real adverse event analysis and discussion on neurological and psychiatric side effects[J]. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol, 2024, 25(1): 49. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-024-00772-4.

30.Yang X, Chen D. Comparing the adverse effects of ketamine and esketamine between genders using FAERS data[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15: 1329436. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024. 1329436.

31.Liu P, Zhang Y, Xu X, et al. Mining and analysis of adverse drug reactions associated with perampanel based on FAERS database[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2023, 145: 109283. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109283.

32.Neuhaus S, Tamburri PA, Weaver MA, et al. Design and outcome measures for a phase 1/2 dose-finding study to evaluate systemic administration of an AAV9-based gene therapy for peripheral manifestations of Gaucher disease[J]. Mol Genet Metab, 2023, 138(2): 107239. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.107239.

33.Lee NE, Sutherland RK. Lenacapavir and the novel HIV-1 capsid inhibitors: an emerging therapy in the management of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 virus[J]. Curr Opin Infect Dis, 2023, 36(1): 15-19. DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000896.

34.Berry DA, Dhadda S, Kanekiyo M, et al. Lecanemab for patients with early Alzheimer disease: Bayesian analysis of a phase 2b dose-finding randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(4): e237230-e237230. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7230.

35.Rafii MS, Sperling RA, Donohue MC, et al. The AHEAD 3-45 Study: design of a prevention trial for Alzheimer's disease[J]. Alzheimers Dement, 2023, 19(4): 1227-1233. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12748.

36.Tahami Monfared AA, Ye W, Sardesai A, et al. Estimated societal value of lecanemab in patients with early Alzheimer's disease using simulation modeling[J]. Neurol Ther, 2023, 12(3): 795-814. DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00460-1.

Popular papers
Last 6 months