Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 35,2026 No.4 Detail

Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate in blood purification therapy in patients with high risk of bleeding: a Meta-analysis

Published on Apr. 28, 2026Total Views: 71 times Total Downloads: 20 times Download Mobile

Author: BI Yahong 1 HU Jiachang 2 SHENG Junqin 1 ZHENG Ying 1 FENG Jianxun 1 FANG Yi 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Xuhui District Central Hospital, Shanghai 200031, China 2. Department of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

Keywords: Nafamostat mesylate Blood purification High risk of bleeding Antico-agulation Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202512048

Reference: BI Yahong, HU Jiachang, SHENG Junqin, ZHENG Ying, FENG Jianxun, FANG Yi. Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate in blood purification therapy in patients with high risk of bleeding: a Meta-analysis[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2026, 35(4): 419-428. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698.202512048.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To systematically review the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate for anticoagulation during blood purification in patients at high risk of bleeding, and to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

Methods  Databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and SinoMed were searched electronically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nafamostat mesylate with other conventional anticoagulation regimens (such as unfractionated heparin, low molecular heparin, sodium citrate, or no anticoagulant, etc.) for blood purification in high-risk bleeding patients, the retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to October 31, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results  A total of 10 RCTs involving 666 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with other anticoagulation regimens, nafamostat mesylate significantly improved anticoagulation efficacy [RR=1.29, 95% CI (1.06, 1.56), P=0.01] and prolonged dialyzer lifespan [MD=9.35, 95% CI (2.18, 16.52), P=0.01]. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of dialyzer clotting, bleeding complications, adverse reactions, in-hospital mortality, or coagulation parameters (APTT, PT) (P>0.05).

Conclusion  For patients undergoing blood purification who are at high risk of bleeding, nafamostat mesylate is an effective and safe anticoagulant option. It ensures anticoagulation efficacy without increasing the risk of bleeding. However, due to the limitations in the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be further verified by more high-quality, large-sample studies.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. Wang L, Han K, Jiang X, et al. Recent advances in blood toxin removal technology[J]. Sustain Mater Techno, 2024, 39: e00828. DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00828.

2. 王新然, 王建文. 不同血液净化方式在肾移植围手术期的研究进展[J]. 中国血液净化, 2023, 22(12): 925-928. [Wang XR, Wang JW. Research progresses of different blood purification methods in the perioperative period of kidney trans-plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2023, 22(12): 925-928.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2023.12.009.

3. 鲍宏达, 汪年松. 血液净化技术在危重症患者救治中的应用[J]. 上海医学, 2023, 46(9): 622-627. DOI: 10.19842/j.cnki.issn.0253-9934.2023.09.011.

4. Corrêa HL, Deus LA, Nascimento DDC, et al. Concerns about the application of resistance exercise with blood-flow restriction and thrombosis risk in hemodialysis patients[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2024, 13(4): 548-558. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.02.006.

5. 常蓉, 李玲玲. 连续性肾脏替代治疗患者发生管路凝血预测模型的构建[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2022, 22(12): 1016-1022. [Chang R, Li LL. Construction of a predictive model for in-circuit coagulation in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Journal of Clinical Nephrology, 2022, 22(12): 1016-1022.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2022.12.008.

6. Kato C, Oakes M, Kim M, et al. Anticoagulation strategies in extracorporeal circulatory devices in adult populations[J]. Eur J Haematol, 2021, 106(1): 19-31. DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13520.

7. 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会, 《中华医学杂志》编辑委员会. 肝素诱导的血小板减少症中国专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(6): 408-417. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.06.003.

8. 孙雪峰. 连续性肾脏替代治疗中抗凝方案的建议[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(44): 4022-4026. [Sun XF. Proposal of anticoagulant strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2024, 104(44): 4022-4026.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240410-00849.

9. 刘司南, 陈林, 曹晓翼. 局部枸橼酸和无肝素两种抗凝方法在高危出血倾向血液透析中的应用[J]. 华西医学, 2019, 34(8): 928-932. [Liu SN, Chen L, Cao XY. Application of local citrate anticoagulation and heparin-free dialysis in hemodialysis of patients with high risk of bleeding tendency[J]. West China Medical Journal, 2019, 34(8): 928-932.] DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.201906040.

10. 孙献坤, 王芳, 陈志文, 等. 甲磺酸萘莫司他抗凝在连续性肾脏替代治疗的应用进展[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022, 21(11): 827-830. [Sun XK, Wang F, Chen ZW, et al. Progresses in the application of nafamostat mesylate for anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2022, 21(11): 827-830.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2022.11.009.

11. 李双双, 赵德鹏, 丁征. 萘莫司他——血液净化抗凝新选择[J]. 中国合理用药探索, 2025, 22(2): 30-34. [Li SS, Zhao DP, Ding Z. Nafamostat: a new anticoagulation choice for blood purification[J]. Chinese Journal of Rational Drug Use, 2025, 22(2): 30-34.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3327.2025.02.005.

12. 杨振华, 陈秋馨, 李倩玉, 等. 甲磺酸萘莫司他体外抗凝在血液透析高危出血风险患者中的应用观察[J]. 中国血液净化, 2024, 23(9): 651-654, 662. [Yang ZH, Chen QX, Li QY, et al. Observation of extracorporal administration of the anticoagulant nafamostat mesylate in hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Blood Purification, 2024, 23(9): 651-654, 662.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2024.09.003.

13. Liu K, Li ZH. Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate in patients with end-stage renal failure[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2024, 12(1): 68-75. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.68.

14. 陆荣华, 刘姣姣, 庞腾飞, 等. 替戈拉生治疗胃食管反流病有效性与安全性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2025, 34(11): 1294-1301. [Lu RH, Liu JJ, Pang TF, et al. Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2025, 34(11): 1294-1301.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1005-0698. 202502020.

15. 王立辉, 王艺萍, 周健楠, 等. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血患者血液透析治疗中的抗凝优势[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2025, 27(5): 72-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463.2025.05.014.

16. 沙莎. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在高危出血风险维持性血液透析患者治疗中的应用效果[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2025, 38(16): 2775-2777. DOI: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2025.16.022.

17. 杨瑞红, 王伟. 甲磺酸萘莫司他与阿加曲班在高出血风险患者连续性肾替代治疗中的应用效果比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2025, 10(27): 76-79. [Yang RH, Wang W. Comparison of the application effect of nafamostat mesylate and argatroban in continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with high bleeding risk[J]. Clinical Research and Practice, 2025, 10(27): 76-79.] DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202527019.

18. 莫雷同, 朱亨玲, 陈美慧, 等. 甲磺酸萘莫司他在血液高凝状态重症患者连续性血液净化的抗凝效果研究[J]. 岭南急诊医学杂志, 2024, 29(5): 547-549. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-301X.2024.05.029.

19. 胡雪峰, 刘志刚, 李鹏, 等. 萘莫司他对血液透析高危出血倾向患者的治疗效果研究[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2024, 40(1): 99-102. [Hu XF, Liu ZG, Li P, et al. Therapeutic effect of nafamostat on hemodialysis patients with high risk of bleeding tendency[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, 2024, 40(1): 99-102.] DOI: 10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2024.01.023.

20. Choi JY, Kang YJ, Jang HM, et al. Nafamostat mesilate as an anticoagulant during continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with high bleeding risk: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(52): e2392. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002392.

21. Lee YK, Lee HW, Choi KH, et al. Ability of nafamostat mesilate to prolong filter patency during continuous renal replacement therapy in patients at high risk of bleeding: a randomized controlled study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e108737. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108737.

22. Kim EY, Lee YK, Lee SM, et al. Low-dose nafamostat mesilate in hemodialysis patients at high bleeding risk[J]. Korean J Nephrol, 2011, 30(1): 61-66. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=2307157.

23. Park II, Choi MJ, Yoon JW, et al. Saline versus nafamo stat mesilate anticoagulation for continuous veno-ven ous hemofiltration (CVVH) in patients at high risk of bleeding: a prospective study[J]. Korean J Nephrol, 2009, 28(3): 205-210. https://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?RID=1465940.

24. amamoto M, Kiso M, Sakai-Tagawa Y, et al. The anticoagulant nafamostat potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 S protein-mediated fusion in a cell fusion assay system and viral infection in vitro in a cell-type-dependent manner[J]. Viruses, 2020, 12(6): 629. DOI: 10.3390/v12060629.

25. Hernández-Mitre MP, Tong SYC, Denholm JT, et al. Nafamostat mesylate for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalised patients: a structured, narrative review[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2022, 61(10): 1331-1343. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01170-x.

26. Hirota M, Shimosegawa T, Kitamura K, et al. Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2020, 55(3): 342-352. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z.

27. Horváth IL, Kleiner D, Nagy R, et al. Nafamostat reduces the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2024, 115(2): 206-212. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3118.

Popular papers
Last 6 months